Search results

It's still a requirement My problem is with the word "far-fetched." There is something wrong with his definition, in that he partly contradicts himself. When we refer to reasonable foreseeability, Mason says, we are not refering to probabilty. Yet he defines reasonable foreseeability as not...

Some people's lives. Living standards will increase but a disproportionate gap means greater inequality in the distribution of social power.

sugard plum should meet "jennylim" --

My aim in life is to get rid of Mason's "far-fetched and fanciful" definition of reasonable foreseeability at the breach stage it's bogus, completely bogus

Jesus.. it's shocking to see this from a girl... and very sad

Because they might realise that not only science has advanced, but our conception of morality. Slavery was fine not too long ago. We cannot think that a religious institution with an ancient tradition and belief in slavery, that thinks they will go to hell if they do not believe and adhere to...

Be thankful you have smart friends :)

lol "not kirby" = "[someone who is] not Kirby" die maths man die

Gleeson is my fav, I find he often has brilliant clarity - very sleek judgments. He's also not a bad speaker, has an intimidating grasp of the law (suprise suprise) and has a very scary death stare that he inadvertantly assumes randomly while speaking. Kirby, Denning and Dixon are my...

Firstly, I clearly did not say important to all women, explicitly or by implication. Secondly, but rather innocently this time, you interpreted "fundamentally important to their sex" as "fundamentally important in the eyes of [women]." My meaning was intended to be "fundamentally important...

ahahahaha That's gold Jerry, GOLD!

LOL!! I've read it, it's pretty well written, even if you don't agree with it there is benefit from seeing that point of view

Yes, I agree that protest is a good thing in order to historically record public disapproval. It's just that, strangely, some people think that in this instance they can change the situation

Judicial nominations are a bad idea. In Australia, one might say that there is little difference because the government of the day selects the judge. But elections would mean really politicising the judge selection process. What I would like to see is a body in Australia that selects judges for...

I don't discourage public expression about government policies, but some people seem to have adopted the attitude that their protests will somehow change the situation. It will not.

I thought the poster was fine :) Just so long as you do a version for the girls, to balance it out

Probably, but I have been told in particular there. Our family friend worked there for many years

No, that is not what I said at all. When I said "women first" I meant that they are driving for something fundamentally important to their sex over party politics.

in metaphysics... the guy is so boring, like an old gray moth

That's true - in fact I was thinking of going to that raising the bar talk but it seems like it is intended soley for women :(