This is proof the SC means shit all.
2009 SC
English - 82
Geo - 81
History - 83
Maths - 76
Science - 77
2011 HSC
English Adv - 95
Business Studies - 90
Legal Studies - 96
Gen Maths - 94
Studies of Religion II - 90
Hmm i thought so to but she said it's not, but really, how can C be correct? She said if the distribution of people is close between the two they might do both answers
What did you think of the one about which crime was chargeable was it b) conspiracy and robbery or d) robbery
I put down B aswell, but my teacher marked last year and said ratification in Australia is simply the process of signing a treaty without the enactment of legislation. But then she said c) was ambiguous because the Government can enact human rights legislation regardless of signing a treaty or...
Yeah hoping for a 94 or 96 if questions are good fuarrkk
It's really not worth doing an all nighter guise get some sleep it's worth the benefits of concentration.
What do you guys think the short answers might be?
I'm thinking.
Evaluate the effectiveness of international measures in promoting and enforcing human rights (8 Marks)
Discuss arguments for and against bill of rights (4 Marks)
This. your evaluation and use of cases is good, but, i would structure on what penalties. eg. start from smallest to largest fines --> CSO ---> Imprisonment etc and evaluate how each of the penalties does justice for one or the other (that way you can get better evaluation such as imprisonment =...
You didn't catch me out on shit.. wtf are you trying to self righteously glorify yourself about? And the fact you were willing and wanted to start some big debate on a Sunday arvo on a HSC forum when you probably finished ages ago insinuates the "basement dweller tag"
yeah true, my teacher marked last year and she said for some you can just tell the cases etc. are bullshit because they do it in the most stupid way possible.