Yeah, the same for the Roosters.stazi said:No the knights aren't gone. there's still numerous weeks left. stop overexaggerating everything.
Yeah, IMO you guys will struggle without them, but with the inconsistency of NRL, we'll see...SyCoTiC said:Hope to god the Broncos chance their arms even with the absence of Locky and Karmichael tomorrow night or else we're in for a hiding against the Eels. TUNZA TO KICK A 40/20!
Of course it had nothing at all to do with the Storm playing poorly.Teddy Lee said:OMGOSH OMGOSH OMGOSH
ROOSTERS BEAT THE STORM 26-16!!!!!!!!!!
As much as I love the roosters, never in my wildest dreams did I think we'd beat the competition leaders by such a convincing margin.
Everyone just played so WELL. There was cohesion and structure and EXECUTION in attack and really good defence too, except we got lazy towards the dying minutes. Wow to John Williams' first try. Pure strength willpower there.
FREDDY!!!!!!! He's worked WONDERS for their confidence!! And they're playing like they really enjoy it now!!
ROOSTERS <3 YAYAYAYAYAY!
I don't care what 100 first grade players said. I watch most games and the standard of play this year has been absolutely horrible.Teddy Lee said:Actually, a survey of 100 first grade players said the majority believed the game was at a better standard than last year.
storms actually didn't play all that bad, it was the chooks who did exceptionally (hell, almost unbelieveably) well to play the storms out of their game. full credit to the roosters, and you cannot any of that away from them.iamsickofyear12 said:Of course it had nothing at all to do with the Storm playing poorly.
I have almost had enough with the competition this year. It may be close but the playing standard is horrible and I am sick of it. I hope it is better next year.
By poor playing standards I am referring to the constant dropped ball, missed tackles, pathetic efforts in attack, inability to score points, a ridiculous amount of inconsistency from just about every team except for the Storm and the Eagles, a ridiculous amount of inconsistency from just about all individual players, etc...wuddie said:the playing standards? care to explain? it has been the same every year, there are the good games and the poorer games, but out of every game there is a winner and a loser, winners grin and losers weep. there are teams who are willing to throw the ball around, and teams just sticking to the basics, and they will do whatever to get them the 2pts. teams are not out there to entertain you, they are out there to their job - to win at whatever cost.
do you even have stats on any of those things you claim? errors happen in every game, every season, every era. inconsistency is because every team is so even, no team can get on a roll (except for melb, who is in a league of their own) for an extended period. the fact that it is unpredictable, not inconsistent, is nothing less than good for the game.iamsickofyear12 said:By poor playing standards I am referring to the constant dropped ball, missed tackles, pathetic efforts in attack, inability to score points, a ridiculous amount of inconsistency from just about every team except for the Storm and the Eagles, a ridiculous amount of inconsistency from just about all individual players, etc...
It has not been the same every year. You usually expect some teams to struggle but this year way too many have been horribly inconsistent. The 5th place team doesn't even have a winning record. The Cowboys are in 4th so you would assume they would be good but they aren't exactly playing well either.
Actually they are out to entertain me. Of course their main job is to win but we wouldn't have a competition if no one wanted to watch it. Not to mention the fact that apart from a few teams no one is winning consistently so they really aren't doing their jobs anyway.
Yes, same here.wuddie said:jees, i find your comments can be quite ignorant sometimes.
Remember, they are only human...iamsickofyear12 said:By poor playing standards I am referring to the constant dropped ball, missed tackles, pathetic efforts in attack, inability to score points, a ridiculous amount of inconsistency from just about every team except for the Storm and the Eagles, a ridiculous amount of inconsistency from just about all individual players, etc...
It has not been the same every year. You usually expect some teams to struggle but this year way too many have been horribly inconsistent. The 5th place team doesn't even have a winning record. The Cowboys are in 4th so you would assume they would be good but they aren't exactly playing well either.
Actually they are out to entertain me. Of course their main job is to win but we wouldn't have a competition if no one wanted to watch it. Not to mention the fact that apart from a few teams no one is winning consistently so they really aren't doing their jobs anyway.
agreed. i'll still watch the nrl when i can and everything, because its league, but seriously the standard of play sucks..iamsickofyear12 said:I don't care what 100 first grade players said. I watch most games and the standard of play this year has been absolutely horrible.
Roosters don't have the worst F/A any more.wuddie said:holy crap, knights got thrashed, again. they have dead set the softest defence in the comp at the moment. granted they are plagued with injuries, but 52-10 is a hiding. in the past 3 weeks, they have only scored 27 points and conceded 116, what are you doing brian smith?