2024 HSC Chat (125 Viewers)

[Legendary16]

Ok. Guess I'll have to absolutely smash paper 2 to bring up my results.

Same here

 

[K1uggie]

Good to see im not the only one who struggled with the last short answer

it was so hard omg i said the dynamic was caring and pedagogical but a friend says it was strict and uncaring??

 

[lyingsalsa]

im this

it was so hard omg i said the dynamic was caring and pedagogical but a friend says it was strict and uncaring??

i said dynamic between lightness and seriousness idk man

 

[Legendary16]

it was so hard omg i said the dynamic was caring and pedagogical but a friend says it was strict and uncaring??

Oh so that's what they meant by dynamic...ok...

 

[lyingsalsa]

how did people find the essay q

 

[Legendary16]

how did people find the essay q

It was a blessing ngl

 

[lyingsalsa]

It was a blessing ngl

i thought that too. but that probably means paper 2s gonna be brutal.

 

[enchantedivory27]

it was so hard omg i said the dynamic was caring and pedagogical but a friend says it was strict and uncaring??

the dynamic with the father and child was caring cos he loved her and wanted to help her, i think i just said the mother was judgy
i was also like there is a voyeuristic tone from the writer as they were 3rd person and looking in on the whole "dynamic", maybe you could have talked about the title "Trust" but i didn't have time.

 

[saltedparsley]

did anyone do All The Light We Cannot See?

yea bro
hate common mod

 

[katiekms]

it was so hard omg i said the dynamic was caring and pedagogical but a friend says it was strict and uncaring??

i said it was formal and academic and wealthy and stuff

 

[igor9]

it was so hard omg i said the dynamic was caring and pedagogical but a friend says it was strict and uncaring??

surely if ur take and analysis is good they give us good marks for that bruh, like even if u said something different because im sure everybody had different takes on it. my take was more to the latter one, but idk if it is right coz that's what i thought in the exam.

 

[Solarised]

Paper 2 is going to give us all options (persuasive, narrative, discrusive etc.) I swear this on ksi's new song

 

[rosieohposie]

wait there's no way you're a steiner kid right...

i've never heard of that method of school until now so no, i wish i could afford those fees though lol

 

[thelittlepotatofrog]

istg im gonna quit school rn

 

[Edward34245]

If in short answer you write a large response to a question and some of it has really good analysis and some bad, are you likely to get good marks?

 

[Solarised]

surely if ur take and analysis is good they give us good marks for that bruh, like even if u said something different because im sure everybody had different takes on it. my take was more to the latter one, but idk if it is right coz that's what i thought in the exam.

As long as you gave quotes and evidence top prove your point yes

 

[igor9]

i thought their family was disconnected, as at one point the father didn't pay attention to the daughter, and then the next minute he is not paying attention to his wife, so surely that was a dynamic that could be picked up on?

 

[thelittlepotatofrog]

If in short answer you write a large response to a question and some of it has really good analysis and some bad, are you likely to get good marks?

I think so, in the hsc they cant take away marks for stuff u don't have only give marks for stuff u do have (unless what you don't have was like the one thing it needed)

 

[Coxy07]

If in short answer you write a large response to a question and some of it has really good analysis and some bad, are you likely to get good marks?

probably just average marks, they wouldn't mark on how long the response it is

 

[igor9]

As long as you gave quotes and evidence top prove your point yes

it's more abt analysis coz u can't always have crazy techniques, but if ur overall response is good im sure it is possible coz for internals one time i got 5/5 for a question with like 1 or 2 actual techniques