Solarised
Well-Known Member
Yea but you ain't even complaining bout the subject, just on the unprepared peoplethe damage eng has done to me for 2 yrs is too significant to forget about in just 6 hrs
Yea but you ain't even complaining bout the subject, just on the unprepared peoplethe damage eng has done to me for 2 yrs is too significant to forget about in just 6 hrs
dont think thats happening lol
what if instead of taking HSC exams we were all ordered to peg submissive femboyswhat if instead of english it was freaklish
realest thing someone has posted herewhat if instead of taking HSC exams we were all ordered to peg submissive femboys
mod 7 is meh for me and mod 8... our teacher finished that on the last day like wtf mrs cooper! anyway mod 6 and 5 are better, hoping its just a normal investigating examvery very late reply but how are you feeling about the investigating exam?? the only module i feel like i actually know super well is mod 7... otherwise i'm so cooked
chill i am worried for 2025How were both English Papers. I am hearing mixed opinions, i cbb bothered going back to read other messages though
Advanced-How were both English Papers. I am hearing mixed opinions, i cbb bothered going back to read other messages though
omg someone else doing cafs, very random but for section 2, how long do your responses tend to be?cafs on friday this is not conducive to positive emotional wellbeing
Oath cuntwhat if instead of taking HSC exams we were all ordered to peg submissive femboys
can I get over 15 if i didn't actually mention texual integrity, but i think i still answered most of it rightAdvanced-
Paper 1 was weird to me. It was a 3, 4, 5, 3, 5 marker split (like wtf) and I personally did poorly
Common module question was a 3 part and good for those who treated each quality/motivations/action as a different concept in relationship. Needed to have prepared thoroughly/a good understanding of your text to do well
Paper 2 was both good and bad. Depends on the person
Mod A was broad and a nice question for those prepared asking you how ur perception of the later text changed from reading the earlier one
Mod B was about 'artistry' and 'textual integrity' and you needed to address how ur text was that, and its 'literary value'. I didn't like the question but I think it was solid and niche enough that a key differentiator might be whether you knew their definitions, and shaped ur thesis in line to it
Mod C was a 20 mark discursive/persuasive. 2025 will for sure be a split
Did you mention anything about its definition? What was your thesis?can I get over 15 if i didn't actually mention texual integrity
if you talked about the enduring value of the text over time then that implies it, but you could get a pedantic markercan I get over 15 if i didn't actually mention texual integrity, but i think i still answered most of it right
cant remember lowkey made it up. but i think it was decentDid you mention anything about its definition? What was your thesis?
To be honest if you talked a lot about ur text being 'art' or 'a coherent whole of [writing form style etc]' you could probably scrape by. I have a feeling the high range will have lower standards this year so who knowscant remember lowkey made it up. but i think it was decent
God, I really messed up. I had practised so much and knew all of this but just panicked for like no reason. I don't think I spoke about the enduring valueif you talked about the enduring value of the text over time then that implies it, but you could get a pedantic marker