A good way to study - Law&Soc/Human Rights (1 Viewer)

[goan_crazy]

i'd say D because it covers negligence and Anita wasn't looking after her dog. Btw does capialism have anything to do with legal? I'm pretty sure it doesn't...

thankyou! damnation agreed with me! and shes smart! u go girl
it doesnt. thats more economics, business term
i was wondering y manifestation asked that b4!

 

[monique66]

thankyou! damnation agreed with me! and shes smart! u go girl
it doesnt. thats more economics, business term
i was wondering y manifestation asked that b4!

Yeah, i thought so...lets see, i have no idea what has been asked in this thread so sorry if this question repeats something else already said:

Explain why state soveirgnty limits the effectiveness of human rights

 

[goan_crazy]

Yeah, i thought so...lets see, i have no idea what has been asked in this thread so sorry if this question repeats something else already said:

Explain why state soveirgnty limits the effectiveness of human rights

it is not effective beacuse even if there is problems, another nation state cannot interfere therefore not being accessible for human rights adressing and limits enforacbility

what is the doctorine on the separation of powers?

 

[monique66]

it is not effective beacuse even if there is problems, another nation state cannot interfere therefore not being accessible for human rights adressing and limits enforacbility

what is the doctorine on the separation of powers?

It is a notion of law that establishes the three arms of the government. The legislature controls the introuduction of legislation, the judiciary interprets this and the executive enforces the law. However, it must be noted that these three arms are separate and prevent one arm from having too much power (however, i think now that the govt has won majority of the seats in the senate there will be an inequilibrium of power now )

 

[monique66]

Expain the doctrine of reception and the justification of european settlement in Australia

 

[goan_crazy]

Expain the doctrine of reception and the justification of european settlement in Australia

Doctrine of reception
is this when the law of the nation who conquest the land applies
e.g. britian's law when colonising australia
however if the land is gained through agreement or something else, the law of the original nation applies
is that rite? made sum of it up coz i couldnt remember ALL of it but i tried

anyway next question: what are the 3 arms of government?

 

[monique66]

Doctrine of reception
is this when the law of the nation who conquest the land applies
e.g. britian's law when colonising australia
however if the land is gained through agreement or something else, the law of the original nation applies
is that rite? made sum of it up coz i couldnt remember ALL of it but i tried

anyway next question: what are the 3 arms of government?

the doctrine of reception was the notion under which the British colonised Australia. Under this doctrine, if a sytem of law was present in the country then the British must make an agreement (like in New Zealand), if not then they were allowed to conquer the land under 'terra nullius'. As the europeans failed to recognise the compleX nature of Aboriginal Law, they colonised Australia under 'terra nullius'. However, this notion was dimissed in 1992 after the Mabo case established this as legal fiction.

judiciary, executive and legislature.

Next Q: Explain what the division of powers is

 

[manifestation]

thankyou! damnation agreed with me! and shes smart! u go girl
it doesnt. thats more economics, business term
i was wondering y manifestation asked that b4!

I asked cause i got it out of the freakin HSC paper you knob! Jeez! God i post a question cause no-one else freakin bothers!

Damnations question:
Next Q: Explain what the division of powers is

 

[still waiting]

division of powers is like the government giving some of their powers to subsiduary bodies isnt it? im not sure i pulled this out of nowhere lol

 

[monique66]

division of powers is like the government giving some of their powers to subsiduary bodies isnt it? im not sure i pulled this out of nowhere lol

Nah, its more like: the division of powers is where the power to rule the country is divided in between the Commonwealth and the State. The state may make laws but they must not conflict with Commonwealth legislation. However, while the Commonwealth can override State legislation it can only act under section 52 of the constitution which outlines its powers. Thus the state has residual powers and the Commonwealth has specific powers.

Hey manifestation, what HSC paper is that question in? Where abouts in the textbook?

Next Q: Outline a current human rights issue within Australia and explain the effectiveness of the legal system in providing human rights.

 

[= Jennifer =]

its c tort law
failure to act duty of care?
right manifestation?

no not duty of care really trespass to land and goods

 

[melsc]

no not duty of care really trespass to land and goods

thats what i thought

 

[manifestation]

Hey manifestation, what HSC paper is that question in? Where abouts in the textbook?

http://www.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au/hsc_exams/hsc2002exams/pdf_doc/legal_studies_02.pdf

pg 4

Jeez you're making me sound dumb! I got it from a reliable source and i know its to do with legal studies!

And the answer is D

 

[= Jennifer =]

thats what i thought

melsc you are well on the way to becoming an excellent law student

 

[monique66]

http://www.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au/hsc_exams/hsc2002exams/pdf_doc/legal_studies_02.pdf

pg 4

Jeez you're making me sound dumb! I got it from a reliable source and i know its to do with legal studies!

And the answer is D

oh no, i didn't want to make you sound dumb! i wasn't even asking about that question, i meant the one you asked about capitalism, i didn't see that in the text book and it reminded me of eco so i really wanted to know in case i missed it in legal
and as for the answer being D i was right! Yay!

 

[goan_crazy]

oh no, i didn't want to make you sound dumb! i wasn't even asking about that question, i meant the one you asked about capitalism, i didn't see that in the text book and it reminded me of eco so i really wanted to know in case i missed it in legal
and as for the answer being D i was right! Yay!

*cough*we were right

=jennifer= what about me

 

[still waiting]

Nah, its more like: the division of powers is where the power to rule the country is divided in between the Commonwealth and the State. The state may make laws but they must not conflict with Commonwealth legislation. However, while the Commonwealth can override State legislation it can only act under section 52 of the constitution which outlines its powers. Thus the state has residual powers and the Commonwealth has specific powers.
Next Q: Outline a current human rights issue within Australia and explain the effectiveness of the legal system in providing human rights.

i told you i pulled it out of my arse i had no idea lol
a current human rights issue is mandatory sentencing the ratio of indigenous peoples to non indigenous in the NT gaols are higher and theere for the laws tend to discriminate against indigenous peoples. the laws are ineffective as there have been submissions into the issue by the UN and the federal government knows that its going on but doesnt use its power to overrule the NT government even though it can

 

[= Jennifer =]

*cough*we were right

=jennifer= what about me

oh i am sure u would be excellent too maybe fantabulous

 

[goan_crazy]

oh i am sure u would be excellent too maybe fantabulous

oh thankyou = Jennifer =
hows ur law degree coming along?
wanna give us the next question

 

[manifestation]

That wasnt a genuine compliment cause he pretty much asked for it!HAHAHAHAHAHA! Anyway thats some funny crap!