Deliriously
Member
b6 cut off for 2010 was 75 and i found that exam hardest by far. so probably ~77
I doubt it will go above 80. Probably mid 70's.Sorry, I just reread the database in 2010 75 was the B6 cut-off. So it'll probs be 80-81 this year.
Just because you found it easy, doesn't mean everyone else did. Imo it was probably about as hard as 2010. It will be around 75.Sorry, I just reread the database in 2010 75 was the B6 cut-off. So it'll probs be 80-81 this year.
+1Just because you found it easy, doesn't mean everyone else did. Imo it was probably about as hard as 2010. It will be around 75.
Spot on, and you have to not only factor your own performance but also how the rest of the state would have gone. Maybe you understood the concepts and applied them quite well, fact is most of the state most likely did not ie. had a kid in my class today trying to tell me that the best radioisotopes to use for diagnostic imaging (med phys) would be the ones with the longest half-life as they would cost less over time.... righttt.Just because you found it easy, doesn't mean everyone else did. Imo it was probably about as hard as 2010. It will be around 75.
That won't get top ten. There would be many people out there who know the content of the syllabus concisely and if you are good at calculations it wasn't that hard an exam..Top 10 in the state.
Don't count on it.
90 is usually a state rank.That won't get top ten. There would be many people out there who know the content of the syllabus concisely and if you are good at calculations it wasn't that hard an exam..
closer to 82 I'd say.would a 60 raw become an 85?
They were not easy calculations. In fact, pretty sure most people were saying it was a difficult test...No way, atleast 80 this test was very easy. Soo much calculations
This, I'm curious of the exact same question !hey does anyone know what 84-85 raw would align to? cheers.
92-93hey does anyone know what 84-85 raw would align to? cheers.