Digital cameras (1 Viewer)

[tt_j65]

http://www.canon.co.jp/Imaging/eosdigital/index.html

Canon Digital Rebel 300D!!!!!

w00tah

oh wait.. im dreaming and you dont meet the budget..

yea.. get an ixus 400

 

[detox]

www.eyo.com.au cheap BenQ cameras ~$200 heard they are good for the price

 

[Kn1ght_M4r3]

Hey are the Kodak and Canon Cameraz, good at taken pictures in real low lighting areaz?
im not to sure about them so take that into consideration, ehheeh. i know the sony cybershot cameraz have some red light thing that appears coz my friend has one and yeah thats pretty kwel technology. i duno about the other ones. another friend of mine has the panasonic DMC - F7 or something like that, and yeah its not very good at taken pictures in the dark, its hard to see it on the lcd screen to. so yeah heeheh

 

[Huy]

Originally posted by Kn1ght_M4r3
Hey are the Kodak and Canon Cameraz, good at taken pictures in real low lighting areaz?
im not to sure about them so take that into consideration, ehheeh.

I have a 3.1MP Kodak DX4330 and it works a charm in lowlight, even with the flash off it takes good pics (in my opinion, im not much of a photographer).

Remember, Sony aren't "real" photography specialists, but Canon and Kodak have been in the business for much longer.

So yes, I would say it takes good pictures in lowlight.
As the LCD has been designed for indoor and outdoor usage (as advertised on the camera )

 

[Kn1ght_M4r3]

ahhh icic. yeah i was leaning towards a canon, not kodak coz the kodak camera was like too big.
Is there a specific problem with the sony cybershot cameraz? my friend seems to b0ast on an on about his 3.1MP cybershot camera.

 

[Kn1ght_M4r3]

http://www.pcuser.com.au/pcuser/hs2.nsf/dir/LatestEdition
Babydoll yah should g0 and buy that magazine it tellz yah about Digital cameraz. and apparently SOny did pretty gwed. the cybershot ones i think it was. it got like a 9/10. if i go out ill buy it and tell yah the reviews, canon and olympus did poorly.
=0o