He's like the anti-godwin's law.Captain Gh3y said:The poor guy has had his words used to justify every theological & political stance imaginable
He's like the anti-godwin's law.Captain Gh3y said:The poor guy has had his words used to justify every theological & political stance imaginable
I can imagine the second part Enteebee But for something to spark off time...what WAS that? So as u say i imagine everything frozen....but then there must have been some convergence , some occurance..yet..HOW? when there was no time , no things that ever did anything... this is the part i cannot understand.Enteebee said:Imagine our reality as it is now stopping suddenly in a freeze frame, all our attributes are only capable of 1 thing. That is the universe without time. Now just imagine that instead of a reality with an extremely changed form such as ours you have a reality made up of the most basic form of everything we currently have.
Okay, I think I just fried a few thousand brain cells trying to understand all that. Kudos on being able to come up with an answer, though. I'll be content with knowing that its something I can't comprehend...Enteebee said:Imagine our reality as it is now stopping suddenly in a freeze frame, all our attributes are only capable of 1 thing. That is the universe without time. Now just imagine that instead of a reality with an extremely changed form such as ours you have a reality made up of the most basic form of everything we currently have.
I wont hurt my mind, but im going to think about things that interest mesqueenie said:Hmm... I don't think its something that we'll ever be able to imagine. Humanity has its limits, and we really should take note of that. If we tried to extend ourselves beyond our limits, well, we'd really screw ourselves over.
Don't hurt your mind thinking about it. There are much better things to be done, honestly.
Nothing made time begin it just did it i.e. There was a part of that frozen universe which said 'begin time', frozen things (meaning those without time) are capable of having 1 property or... existing in 1 state which doesn't change etc... like I said, it is possible to posit a god that created time but all he'd be able to do is create time.*TRUE* said:I can imagine the second part Enteebee But for something to spark off time...what WAS that? So as u say i imagine everything frozen....but then there must have been some convergence , some occurance..yet..HOW? when there was no time , no things that ever did anything... this is the part i cannot understand.
Always good to do that. Just don't overdo it.*TRUE* said:I wont hurt my mind, but im going to think about things that interest me
Frozen things are capable of beginning things? So you mean you think there was something before, maybe time before...and then it was frozen?Enteebee said:Nothing made time begin it just did it i.e. There was a part of that frozen universe which said 'begin time', frozen things are capable of beginning things... like I said, it is possible to posit a god that created time but all he'd be able to do is create time.
I'm an atheist so I don't have a religion, why?beentherdunthat said:hey chadd whats your religion ?
Archer's paradox, lol.*TRUE* said:Frozen things are capable of beginning things? So you mean you think there was something before, maybe time before...and then it was frozen?
So somehow something had the ability to know how to begin 'time'.
If a God can create time , which seems to me the most incredibly difficult and foreign concept (beginning , creating time), then i would almost assume he would be capable of anything ?
im asking coz i cbb readin this threadEnteebee said:I'm an atheist so I don't have a religion, why?
can u spellSchroedinger said:He's a Sufi Muslim.
Hey why dont you answer for me instead of shaking your head? dude.3unitz said:omg diana *shakes head*
Like I said, that's the Arrow paradox.*TRUE* said:Hey why dont you answer for me instead of shaking your head?
I do want an answer....
I only brought God into it cause Enteebee made mention
In all honesty, does IQ really matter? As far as I know, its just a number that makes you look smart. And as Schroedinger said, it doesn't prove anything...Garygaz said:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ak5Lr3qkW0
The smartest (By IQ) current living man believes in God. Higher IQ than Darwin and Einstein. He's a bouncer at a club lol
uncertainty IMO. If we know its exact position we can't know it's momentum.Schroedinger said:Valency states.
GAME ON.