I reckon Hoppa should fight Tyson, so u would have bum poker Vs Ear biterHSC_sUcKsSsS said:no one wants hopiwaty end of story
hes unclean and portray a bad image no matter what hes doing
hopiwaty has connotations of fingering
I reckon Hoppa should fight Tyson, so u would have bum poker Vs Ear biterHSC_sUcKsSsS said:no one wants hopiwaty end of story
hes unclean and portray a bad image no matter what hes doing
hopiwaty has connotations of fingering
Lol, you're throwing the baby out with the bathwater.Morning Glory said:I totally disagree - he may not have a history of "shoulder charge" incidents but he has a history of behavioural misconduct - like i said as if the "fingering" incident isnt enough proof! this is a case of total misconduct! This player has a history of such unclean hits and other behavioural issues. If he didnt have such a history of misconduct then yeh sure treat it like anyone else - but for someone who has dealt in so much misconduct it was about time that they laid down proper consequences for it!
boxing's image will be ruined...foreverKorn said:I reckon Hoppa should fight Tyson, so u would have bum poker Vs Ear biter
Lol this is such a vicious cycle - we will just keep going around and around in a circle arguing our opinions. About this "subjectivity" you talk of - dont you think it is more than deserved - he may not have made 'unclean hits' but the bottom line is his behavioural problems undermine all that anyway - the point that he has had such a history makes it in itself, an unclean hitSmokey_22 said:The tribunal treated the case in this subjective way - taking notoriety into account.
(I'm sounding like Hoppa's guardian angel, lol)
Oh and no, like i said, he had no history of 'such unclean hits'.
that's what i don't agree with.Morning Glory said:- the point that he has had such a history makes it in itself, an unclean hit