You still haven't posted the link that you're basing your claim on. Unless the link is a .gov or a .edu site, yours is a commercial site also and just as unreliable. There's no point discussing the relative reliability of my site if yours isn't up for scrutiny also.Korn said:Yes having a link needs to be reliable, but how can a commercial site be considered reliable, it wouldnt fly in uni
And while snopes is a .com, they don't make money-
'We have no sponsors, and no one pays us to operate this site. We pay all the costs of maintaining this web site out of our own pockets, using advertising revenues and public donations to defray the operating expenses. We have no direct contact with the companies whose advertisements appear on our site, and their interests do not influence the content of this site in any way.'
Reliability of sites aside, you still haven't offered any rebuttal for the logical flaw in the G.O.L.F theory- the Scottish/English problem.