lol so you're telling me that blacks are not equal to whites? Wow.the communist left have elevated this race as equal to the jew/asian/european races. It is very obvious once you remove the do good PC glasses that as a whole, they are a world behind.
tiger-lion = ligerwikiwiki said:There is only one human race and only one human species. The definition of a different species is when it can no longer interbreed with members of the defined species. This is possible. Therefore, your argument is null and void.
Good Day.
of course they are not, are you saying their the same? blacks have their tendencies, predispositions and uniqueness like the rest. Brains and self control arent one of them however.Not-That-Bright said:lol so you're telling me that blacks are not equal to whites? Wow.
Actually, it's more like, ligers and tions are entirely infertile, as are mules.wikiwiki said:Can they breed with the original species to produce the same species? no.
a tiger-liger breed = third species.
a lion-liger = fourth species.
dont ignore the dog example.Captain Gh3y said:Actually, it's more like, ligers and tions are entirely infertile, as are mules.
Whether they're separates species is NOT that they can breed, it's whether their offspring are fertile.
if these 'tests' u talk about are real, and white people are smarter than black people (which is wat ur implying) how do you know it has nothing to do with social inequality, culture, etc which are human constructs rather than something that is inherent in your genes?love_muscle said:of course they are not, are you saying their the same? blacks have their tendencies, predispositions and uniqueness like the rest. Brains and self control arent one of them however.
no test has proven whites and blacks to be the same at anything, be it IQ tests, 100m running or anthropologically.
Those dogs aren't even different subspecies.love_muscle said:tiger-lion = liger
maltese terrier - border collie =mongrel
but since im on the topic of dogs, does anyone deny that pugs are different anthropolically and temperamentally than rottweilers?
do you deny that labradors are genetically smarter than afghan hounds?
every race of animal on this planet has different genetic predispositions, be it frogs, dogs or butterflies.
Why deny humans are not the same?
good day
Europeans have been through less too be honest, a lot of unaccounted for massacred of tens upon tens of millions of chinese by the japanese in the 18th century. I am european myself so I would love too say that "we've been through thick and thin and we still kickin'!", but matter of fact is asians have been. Their population is so much because as you know post war, post massacre, post-adversity people mass breed!love_muscle said:in your wording the way you said 'even europeans' i hope your not suggesting europeans have been through less. i know you know they have had it worse than alot (7 million ukranians killed by stalin as an example)
secondly, you are dead right with the jist of your argument. They HAVENT evolved like the rest have, for some reason or the other.
This begs the question, would you breed with somebody 40,000 years behind you in the evolutionary chain?
thirdly, Africans and blacks have been through alot in the past. they regularly fought, killed and cannibalized each other. By your 'troublesome' theory they should really have evolved quicker than the rest.
1. because 'culture friendly' tests do not bridge the gap. even in a normal IQ test, cognitive intelligence (reasoning, spacial awareness, problem solving ability) is tested, not general knowledge.taco man said:if these 'tests' u talk about are real, and white people are smarter than black people (which is wat ur implying) how do you know it has nothing to do with social inequality, culture, etc which are human constructs rather than something that is inherent in your genes?
most african americans have never spent a day in Africa.vern said:Europeans have been through less too be honest, a lot of unaccounted for massacred of tens upon tens of millions of chinese by the japanese in the 18th century. I am european myself so I would love too say that "we've been through thick and thin and we still kickin'!", but matter of fact is asians have been. Their population is so much because as you know post war, post massacre, post-adversity people mass breed!
Africans have lived in a different CULTURE, their CULTURE might be 40,000 years behind which causes this. It's not like they had a choice, their is still plenty of educated Africans, the guy at my work got his B Econ at macquarie and even MB. Do you know why those world vision adds keep pushing for "education" ? Because education would break the vicious cycle of poverty and get africa up off the ground, onto its knees and eventually onto its feet. Remember countries like India, and China where once like this and look at them now, insane rate of growth.
You need too dump alot of prejudice about a country thats had it tough and look at their culture. It explains alot. Also using analogies of when dogs breed they are too different [genetically] too humans, if you want a fair analogy use rats.
Yes, black people are different to others in some ways. They appear to have evolved to be more athletic etc. I don't think the diffentiation is enough to call them a different species any more than 'australians' are a different species to americans because we have uniqueness to them. They are humans, they may be different but I see no reason to make that mean they are not equal with the other humans. There is no real, significant difference, that I can see between black and white people. To me it's like calling leopards a different species if they have black fur (black panthers)of course they are not, are you saying their the same? blacks have their tendencies, predispositions and uniqueness like the rest. Brains and self control arent one of them however.
Not really... the definition is up for debate to be honest. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Species#Definitions_of_speciesWhether they're separates species is NOT that they can breed, it's whether their offspring are fertile.
That's the definition I've learnt.The most commonly cited definition of "species" was first coined by Ernst Mayr. By this definition, called the biological species concept or isolation species concept, species are "groups of actually or potentially interbreeding natural populations which are reproductively isolated from other such groups"
Where exactly did you get that statistic from? Just because a child performs lower in an IQ test than the other doesn't mean imo that their 'intelligence' is necessarily less than that other child , some people don't have mathematical ability but might be quite gifted in the arts... other people can write/perform/create music/art at a highly sophistocated level, but can barely even read.there is a 10% difference in intelligence.
I don't care in particular about my race, to be honest. Also, what about mating with an asian , would you be supportive of whites doing that, I mean after-all... that would lead to more intelligent children - right?and if your white, contribute to the death of your race.
They have been there max 200-300 years, while in Africa have been there about 40,000 years genetically. It's not just where they are born but generation upon generation.love_muscle said:most african americans have never spent a day in Africa.
You obviously haven't met any hot asian guys that are tall and handsome. But then again, judging by your words, you're probably a blonde asian or at least some asian chick that try to be blonde. If that's the case, you're in for a real treat when you get married. Just get ready for a divorce certificate if they actually issue one. Biatch. I take no emotions out of me when I screw chicks like you.phunky said:How the fuck do i quote... Ah well anyway... Lazy: about the genital infeiror thing... hehehe that could be a reason... lol
I am sure many azn guys will defend themselves here.
Oh, I'll defend them for you. Just because your white superiority complex (or lol, inferiority complex) might be getting the better of you. There are super ugly people in every race. Just as there are super beautiful people in every race, and super intelligent, so on, so forth. You can't just lump people into one category, you know. But wait... you don't know how NOT to. Poor you.Originally Posted by phunky
How the fuck do i quote... Ah well anyway... Lazy: about the genital infeiror thing... hehehe that could be a reason... lol
I am sure many azn guys will defend themselves here.
Well how can you pick up someone of another race when the law forces you to use different public facilities to them and has them sit at the back of the bus?wafflesnsorbet said:Interracial relationships... is wishful thinking. Honestly. I'd love to believe in it as well. But I think we're just programmed (by society) to thinking in segregational racial terms.
No, actually, it's a known fact that all white people are beautiful (even Brian Peppers) and all, umm, pygmies of the equatorial congo basin are ugly.wafflesnsorbet said:Oh, I'll defend them for you. Just because your white superiority complex (or lol, inferiority complex) might be getting the better of you. There are super ugly people in every race. Just as there are super beautiful people in every race, and super intelligent, so on, so forth. You can't just lump people into one category, you know. But wait... you don't know how NOT to. Poor you.
I've seen every Asian penis in the world, they're all pindicks.wafflesnsorbet said:And just to settle it, how many Asian assets have you seen anyway? Like... zilch? I really doubt that EVERY SINGLE European male is well endowed. It's called wishful thinking.
So much wrong with your thinking. You need to be re-programmed and taught right-thinking, not wrong-thinking.wafflesnsorbet said:Good grief. White people aren't any smarter or dumber than black people. (As a whole). It's just that they learn different things. Just because you know how to analyse Shakespeare and do calculus doesn't say anything about you AT ALL (other than the fact that you live in a capitalist society). It is all about what you learn, and what opportunities you're presented. If these people were in our shoes, with our privileges, I'm sure they would do just as well, if not better than we're doing. But as it is, they haven't been given the opportunity. Thus, they are the way they are. Genetics and IQ tests don't mean anything at all.
I see. You're one of those "I love the lebs from africa, just as long as i don't have to go near them" types.wafflesnsorbet said:But to be honest, I don't think I'll marry outside my culture. Nothing personal, but I just don't think I'd be able to stand the smell. I like my family, and I want to remain on amiable terms with them. If I ever do fall in love oh-so-madly, I may reconsider...
Western culture is so unbelievably superior to every other culture that was ever invented. I mean, it's only because of western culture that you can say what you're saying. And every single person is NOT beautiful, google image search "brian peppers" if you don't believe me. He's not beautiful at all. Neither are you.wafflesnsorbet said:But it isn't a case of cultural inferiority or superiority, people. It's social perception. We are so exposed to Western culture, the Western definition of beauty has been ingrained in our minds. As cliched as this may sound, everyone is beautiful. Every. Single. Person. Just because you feel inadequate, doesn't mean you have to assert your inferiority complex and make everyone feel terrible as well.
If only we were all so learned...But I suppose you can't help it.