o srry man. Step back.Ath said:who r u gonna trust, the n00b wif 13posts (thagangmaster)
or the master wif 26 posts (ath)
Definately NOT ALL.IcEy said:I'm positive that most if not all 4u ppl would prefer that, yes I know this has been said before.
Well said. I doubt I will get 90 if I did 2u, just way too many silly errors.KeypadSDM said:Why would you do the 2 unit as well when you could just do 4 & 3 unit and bone them both? 2 unit's too easy, and you'll lose pissweak marks because of it. The easier the test, the harder it is to do well.
But I do have to admit that counting 2 units of 3 unit does place a bias on the system. [As proven above].Templar said:Well said. I doubt I will get 90 if I did 2u, just way too many silly errors.
Depends what you define as lengthy. There's more you can study for in 4 unit. But there's less topics.pasta masta said:i must ask isnt the 2 unit course just as lengthy as the 4 Unit, if not more?
chubbaraff said:MASON STFU... PERIOD, Tell me what are you doing at university next year. Whilst I hear and have no sympathy for your argument you fit the exact picture in my brain of the dumbinb down egotistical loser who did not do 4unit coz they cant handle failure. WELL SCREW YOU AND YOUR MINORITY, before i did for unit i had never gotten less then 90% in a class test in 3u prelim and i would get like 60 and 70 maybe 80 sometimes, it was very good for me, failure and being humble are qualities you obviously dont have because you take the road taken! Well im sick of it, if you had done four unit you would agree with me, but you havent u sat in a three unit class and DID NOT push your limits