Tulipa
Loose lips sink ships
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2004
- Messages
- 1,922
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2005
no one said it was propaganda. closest thing was "propaganda-like". which i agree with.011 said:the point being its still not propaganda.
That is idiotic.anti-mathmite said:What has George Bush got to do with this? It is a state issue.
Thankyou for furthering my point by attempting to compare the severity of macquarie fields with thousands of people dying and being dislocated from their houses, not to mention the economic impact through loss of output and infrastructure. You sir, are a twat.anti-mathmite said:No its not; when the riots were on in Sydney with the apes misbehaving in redfern and maq. fields, what role did John Howard have?
When there were bush fires on etc, the federal government has nothing to do with it. The reason why they are suffering over there in New Orleans, is because the state was disorganised.
Its bias level would be no more than say Fox news for the right wing brigade...tempco said:no one said it was propaganda. closest thing was "propaganda-like". which i agree with.
yes, fox news is propoganda-like too. i mean, everyone knows that.supercharged said:Its bias level would be no more than say Fox news for the right wing brigade...
Maybe because he manipulates and lies about facts/figures to attempt to get his point accross, then people say "but what he's saying is true".I think Micheal Moore gets bad rap that is not necessarily deserved, a lot of what he says makes sense, particularly in this case.
i'd argue that you saw out-foxed and took it as the unbridled truth without doing your own independant research.walrusbear said:i'd argue that fox is propaganda
i'd argue that fox is propagandatempco said:yes, fox news is propoganda-like too. i mean, everyone knows that.
What the fuck is a president for if he doesn't lead his people?! All his deliberation was costing lives and you're comparing that to what? A few hoodlums causing riots to a natural disaster which devastated an entire city? You're an idiot.anti-mathmite said:No its not; when the riots were on in Sydney with the apes misbehaving in redfern and maq. fields, what role did John Howard have?
When there were bush fires on etc, the federal government has nothing to do with it. The reason why they are suffering over there in New Orleans, is because the state was disorganised.
I suppose if a hurricane hit queensland,anti-mathmite said:What has George Bush got to do with this? It is a state issue.
not only was that call stupid and incorrect, it came out of nowhere.Not-That-Bright said:i'd argue that you saw out-foxed and took it as the unbridled truth without doing your own independant research.
that comment was hilarious indeed this guy states the obivious facts about america well thats ignorant white men with a lot of power and stupidity! whether you like it or not thats the way the world works nowdays! the thing that makes me laugh at those sadassed moore haters is that when you actually hate someone becuase of their politics/motives/position/persona or whatever they actually set an example and back their argument with appropriate evidences but for moore haters they make fun of his weight not that i dont care becuase they cant say something smart against him cos that man just tells the godamn obivious truth bout the way americans run the world whatever! after all everyone is entitled to their own opinons! if you are offended by my comment then you truly have no life!!!! moore for president!gordo said:that man is an absolute moron
how about he donates some of his fat to africa
LOL! Keep it up meng. <3anti-mathmite said:No its not; when the riots were on in Sydney with the apes misbehaving in redfern and maq. fields, what role did John Howard have?
When there were bush fires on etc, the federal government has nothing to do with it. The reason why they are suffering over there in New Orleans, is because the state was disorganised.
An increase in budget could've helped but it wouldn't have stopped the flooding, it might have made the repair job quicker but the specifications for the levees were for a category 3 storm (a once in 200 year event), Katrina was a category 4.hiphophorray123 said:And don't listen to those who, in the coming days, will reveal how you specifically reduced the Army Corps of Engineers' budget for New Orleans this summer for the third year in a row. You just tell them that even if you hadn't cut the money to fix those levees, there weren't going to be any Army engineers to fix them anyway because you had a much more important construction job for them -- BUILDING DEMOCRACY IN IRAQ
yeah you're right, i don't even read textbooks without doing all the research first myselfNot-That-Bright said:i'd argue that you saw out-foxed and took it as the unbridled truth without doing your own independant research.
i'm sure it would have helped. but it wouldn't have prevented the disaster - nothing could've done that.Xayma said:An increase in budget could've helped but it wouldn't have stopped the flooding, it might have made the repair job quicker but the specifications for the levees were for a category 3 storm (a once in 200 year event), Katrina was a category 4.
and the problem with that is that it is propaganda disguised as "journalism"walrusbear said:i'd argue that fox is propaganda