Multiple Choice (3 Viewers)

[inJust]

I thought it was ratified tbh.

 

[darkdog307]

I got court of criminal appeal as well, because they hear the appeal, and I though the case only goes to high court, not the appeal

 

[wavess]

I thought it was ratified tbh.

ratified doesnt ensure that Australian law is protected, it would be better protected if it was enacted or a law was passed.

 

[shannan94]

I got court of criminal appeal as well, because they hear the appeal, and I though the case only goes to high court, not the appeal

The court of appeal is not the highest court though for appeals on points of law, Burns v Queen for example is a case appealed from the Supreme Court of New South Wales (Court of Criminal Appeal) to the High Court because it is believed the conviction was under erroneous circumstances

 

[shannan94]

ratified doesnt ensure that Australian law is protected, it would be better protected if it was enacted or a law was passed.

You raise a solid point. I stand corrected

 

[wavess]

What was question 2? I thought it was A.

 

[inJust]

16/20 :/

 

[wavess]

Here's the MC, the quality is not too good though:

 

[iamorbid]

Here's the MC, the quality is not too good though: View attachment 26949 View attachment 26953 View attachment 26952 View attachment 26951 View attachment 26950 View attachment 26954

many thanks

 

[Zenox]

B, to establish the state's case

 

[wavess]

B, to establish the state's case

How? I don't understand that answer

 

[rabbitohs123]

B, to establish the state's case

Is that wording wrong though?

Isn't it to establish the STATE of the CASE? not the states case?

Weird af

 

[Zenox]

How? I don't understand that answer

Committal proceeding is the preliminary hearing of a case in the local court to determine f it is serious enough to be tried before a jury in a higher court and if there is enough evidence to establish a case.

 

[Zenox]

I think you are slightly confused between appeals on questions of law, and appeals on sentence because the high court can hear appeals, by special leave, from Federal, State and Territory courts, on questions of law. The highest court for sentence appeals is the Supreme court of appeal. Considering the question concerned a question of law in contrast to a challenge on appeal, it could go to the high court for appeal.

"The CCA is a court of review. This means that it does not hear evidence itself, and in most cases, fresh evidence is not admissible. Where a conviction is challenged, the court will review the proceedings and the judgment of the lower court, and must decide whether an error of law has been shown. An error of law is a misinterpretation or misapplication of a principle of law, or the application of an inappropriate principle of law to the facts concerned."

 

[wogboy23]

Have quickly done the multiple choice section for this year's paper. and quite easy, to be honest:
The answers:
1)D
2)B
3)A
4)D
5)B
6)D
7)[B
8)C
9)A
10)B
11)C
12)C
13)D
14)A
15)A
16)D
17)C
18)D
19) The only real trick here - I would say enactment, as ratification allows for 'enactment' into domestic law which is the final step
20) C

 

[Anonym0us]

What did every1 get for q18 ? I got D

 

[waves2xv14]

i hate reading these threads because it shows how much of a dumbass i am from this ive already got 2 wrong

 

[ic3410]

Have quickly done the multiple choice section for this year's paper. and quite easy, to be honest:
The answers:
1)D
2)B
3)A
4)D
5)B
6)D
7)[B
8)C
9)A
10)B
11)C
12)C
13)D
14)A
15)A
16)D
17)C
18)D
19) The only real trick here - I would say enactment, as ratification allows for 'enactment' into domestic law which is the final step
20) C

Hi, i dont get 16. Could you please expain =)

 

[legallaura]

1 D
2 A
3 A
4 b or c
5 B
6 D
7 D
8 C
9 A
10 B
11 did c then crossed D
12 C
13 D
14 A
15 D
16 C
17 C
18 D
19 B
20 C

Hey there and thanks for putting in yours... but um i got B for 2?! can someone confirm that??
i fudged alot of my MC... rushed it.

 

[wogboy23]

Hi, i dont get 16. Could you please expain =)

Certainly, and I'll be quite frank. Basically they can't ask them questions on the train because it tarnishes the fluidity and methodology of the investigation process - i.e. questions can only be asked after the accused has been arrested (during the interrogation process after the caution has been read). Hence, the answer is D.