• Best of luck to the class of 2024 for their HSC exams. You got this!
    Let us know your thoughts on the HSC exams here
  • YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
MedVision ad

New SMH Article: Changes to English/SOR leaving students vulnerable (4 Viewers)

chingyloke

Ex-Prince of Manchester.
Joined
Aug 4, 2007
Messages
185
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
i still dont think it would be fair, that in a year 12 paper, a person is advantaged by writing two texts because they one, cant follow instructions, or two, cant read given instructions. The second related material and any links established with that related material should be ignored and not marked.
+1
 

lyounamu

Reborn
Joined
Oct 28, 2007
Messages
9,998
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
You neglect to mention that 1) English must be compulsory to allow scaling to occur and 2) English skills are really essential in Australia, and the analytical skills you learn from English help in almost any profession in training your mind. Maths, while also important, is not as crucial. At the least people should have to do ESL imo, if their English isn't good enough to string a few sentences together. The problem, of course, lies in the fact that English no longer develops analytical skills where prepared answers apply; hence what the board decided to do this year.
Wow! I didn't know doing English allowed for scaling to occur. Can someone explain how that is?
 

hosay

Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2008
Messages
65
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
imo, english is the biggest piece of shit that exists, if someone did a shit, and then ate that shit, and then crapped that shit out again, youll get english. In fact, they shouldnt have the right to call it english, instead call it literature. The only part of the whole course that tests english skills is the short answer questions as you really have to be able to apply knowledge. Also, unlike other subjects where your taught stuff (physics, chem, eco etc..), english you have to do most of the work, and its your opinion that matters, and how well your support that opinion. Yes, english skills are neccesay, but studying shakespeare or having an opinion about a book doesnt build them.
 

helper

Active Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2003
Messages
1,183
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
You neglect to mention that 1) English must be compulsory to allow scaling to occur
That is wrong. It does help but it isn't required. Up until the 90s Maths was compulsory in the HSC
 

roar84eighty

Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2008
Messages
507
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
The question explicity mentioned (in case of Judaism) that we should make connection with the daily practice + the sources of truth.
although you have to admit some of the questions for religious traditions other than judaism/budhism and hinduism i think it was were more straight forward
 

cutemouse

Account Closed
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
2,250
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Up until the 90s Maths was compulsory in the HSC
No, Maths itself was never compulsory. However, one subject in the KLA (or w/e it was called) was compulsory, ie. Maths or the sciences (ie. Bio, Chem or Physics).
 

helper

Active Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2003
Messages
1,183
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
No, Maths itself was never compulsory. However, one subject in the KLA (or w/e it was called) was compulsory, ie. Maths or the sciences (ie. Bio, Chem or Physics).
Looking for a source to quote but it was compulsory to complete but not compulsory for your UAI. I'm not sure if the change was for the NEW HSC or just before,
 

cutemouse

Account Closed
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
2,250
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
You neglect to mention that 1) English must be compulsory to allow scaling to occur
You do realise that before the 2001 English wasn't a compulsory subject (in the sense of calculation of the formally known TER).
2) English skills are really essential in Australia, and the analytical skills you learn from English help in almost any profession in training your mind. Maths, while also important, is not as crucial.
That is BS. How the hell does English give you analytical skills? Problem solving in maths on the other hand would give you more of such skills.
 

roar84eighty

Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2008
Messages
507
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
How the hell does English give you analytical skills?
+1, it's true. the only subjects that have improved my analytical skills have been maths, modern history and history extension because i don't do any sciences. english is a ridiculous waste of time.
 

Bdogz

Member
Joined
May 7, 2008
Messages
152
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
I agree, the English that people of today study is a piece of garbage, it is all opinon based, there is never one clear cut answer to an english question unlike maths, and also the marking is biased. Maths is so more important in contemporary society, you use it everywhere, English should be more comprehension based like the good old days back in year 5, 6
 

ekoolish

Impossible?
Joined
Feb 11, 2008
Messages
885
Location
Western Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
I agree, the English that people of today study is a piece of garbage, it is all opinon based, there is never one clear cut answer to an english question unlike maths, and also the marking is biased. Maths is so more important in contemporary society, you use it everywhere, English should be more comprehension based like the good old days back in year 5, 6
That makes no sense. That would mean that the people that study more would benefit, nonsense.
 

verdades

Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2008
Messages
142
Gender
Female
HSC
2009
I'm going to ignore the direction the last few posts have taken, and give my thoughts on the English paper, as that's the one I actually did.

I honestly hope that anyone who wrote two texts does lose marks, as they did not read the question. While I believe they've established this won't be the case, I still hope they do. It's the same as being told to write in a specific form, such as "reflections" in my trial in a modules question. Don't do it, and you're not answering the question.
Anyone who believes/d only one related text would make the exam too short probably didn't have a highly in-depth knowledge of at least one of their related texts. Obviously, that's what the question wanted. If they chose to disregard the question, then they shouldn't get full marks on the question.
And for those who didn't read it correctly... I'll lose marks on any maths question I don't read correctly and thus don't answer correctly, so why shouldn't the same apply for English?
 

we0426

Banned
Joined
Sep 6, 2008
Messages
63
Location
ur house
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
I'm going to ignore the direction the last few posts have taken, and give my thoughts on the English paper, as that's the one I actually did.

I honestly hope that anyone who wrote two texts does lose marks, as they did not read the question. While I believe they've established this won't be the case, I still hope they do. It's the same as being told to write in a specific form, such as "reflections" in my trial in a modules question. Don't do it, and you're not answering the question.
Anyone who believes/d only one related text would make the exam too short probably didn't have a highly in-depth knowledge of at least one of their related texts. Obviously, that's what the question wanted. If they chose to disregard the question, then they shouldn't get full marks on the question.
And for those who didn't read it correctly... I'll lose marks on any maths question I don't read correctly and thus don't answer correctly, so why shouldn't the same apply for English?
WELL TO BE HONEST..I DID USE 2 RELATED TEXTS CAME OUT SO HAPPY THEN GOT TOLD OFF BY MY TEACHER, HEAD TEACHER AND ALL MY NERDY FRIENDS,..see if i had just taken a minute to read da fucking question i would not have used 2 texts..i wrote like 11.5 pages which 2 pages were on a shit related text and the other 9.5 is a good related text plus the prescribed text.......NOW JUST WONDERING M I GONA LOSE MARKS..BY USING 2..coz i swear to god if i knew u had to use 1 related text..i would have used one....some how i dont feel confident in my work now..how fucking sad
 

cem

Premium Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2005
Messages
2,438
Location
Sydney
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
That is wrong. It does help but it isn't required. Up until the 90s Maths was compulsory in the HSC
Actually Maths has never been compulsory.

Up to the mid-90s English was compulsory but didn't necessarily count towards the TER/TES etc.

In the mid-90s it changed to 1 unit of English counting and at least 2 Units of either Maths or Science AND 2 Units of a humanities including English and then the next best units to 10. It meant that everyone had to do some Maths/Science and some humanities besides English - unlike today where students can do just humanities and no Maths or Science or only Maths and Science plus English. I can't remember which side Computers went (not being a computer teacher I simply don't remember).

It meant that even the most humanities oreinted student had to 2 units of either Maths or a Science and that kids could do 4 units of Maths and 4 units of Science along with 2 Units of English and 1 units of something (they had to do 11 units as well).

Now it is only English compulsory with 2 units counting towards ATAR.
 
Last edited:

verdades

Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2008
Messages
142
Gender
Female
HSC
2009
WELL TO BE HONEST..I DID USE 2 RELATED TEXTS CAME OUT SO HAPPY THEN GOT TOLD OFF BY MY TEACHER, HEAD TEACHER AND ALL MY NERDY FRIENDS,..see if i had just taken a minute to read da fucking question i would not have used 2 texts..i wrote like 11.5 pages which 2 pages were on a shit related text and the other 9.5 is a good related text plus the prescribed text.......NOW JUST WONDERING M I GONA LOSE MARKS..BY USING 2..coz i swear to god if i knew u had to use 1 related text..i would have used one....some how i dont feel confident in my work now..how fucking sad
Yeah, some people would have misread it. It'd probably be like one mark if they even did. If you look in one of the "Hot Topic" threads on the front page about it, they apparently decided that you won't.
But like I said. If I misread, say, 5 questions on my maths paper, I'm liable to lose at least one mark for each. It'd be unfair to say in a different subject "It's okay, even though you obviously read the question wrong and didn't answer it properly, we won't take that into account".
Like I said, they came to the conclusion that it won't happen. I personally just with the markers would.
Though having said that... while it took me about a second glance to notice it didn't say "one or more", that's what they wanted. To trip people up and make sure they were reading the questions.
 

helper

Active Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2003
Messages
1,183
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Actually Maths has never been compulsory.

Up to the mid-90s English was compulsory but didn't necessarily count towards the TER/TES etc.

In the mid-90s it changed to 1 unit of English counting and at least 2 Units of either Maths or Science AND 2 Units of a humanities including English and then the next best units to 10. It meant that everyone had to do some Maths/Science and some humanities besides English - unlike today where students can do just humanities and no Maths or Science or only Maths and Science plus English. I can't remember which side Computers went (not being a computer teacher I simply don't remember).
I remember that change, I think that was removed in the HSC. I am trying to remember back to the pre-Metheral reforms that brought in the English compulsory in legislation. So looking at the early Wyndham years of the 60s through to 1989. Time goes too fast.
 

Jeee

Banned
Joined
Jul 15, 2009
Messages
705
Location
Displaced
Gender
Female
HSC
2010
I think it was unfair that the Board of Studies threw in an unanticipated 'twist', because if anything, it was the Board of Studies itself that made the HSC a word-vomiting rampage. Teacher's have been teaching specific content, and students have been following the syllabus to the bone...Also, a lot of what is being taught is incorrect. The chemistry taught in high school is as real as Santa Claus. It makes me wonder what it will be like when I sit the HSC next year...
 

lolrofllol

Member
Joined
Feb 29, 2008
Messages
127
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
I'm going to ignore the direction the last few posts have taken, and give my thoughts on the English paper, as that's the one I actually did.

I honestly hope that anyone who wrote two texts does lose marks, as they did not read the question. While I believe they've established this won't be the case, I still hope they do. It's the same as being told to write in a specific form, such as "reflections" in my trial in a modules question. Don't do it, and you're not answering the question.
Anyone who believes/d only one related text would make the exam too short probably didn't have a highly in-depth knowledge of at least one of their related texts. Obviously, that's what the question wanted. If they chose to disregard the question, then they shouldn't get full marks on the question.
And for those who didn't read it correctly... I'll lose marks on any maths question I don't read correctly and thus don't answer correctly, so why shouldn't the same apply for English?
Have a massive cry, what's done is done. English is NOT maths, and reading a question in maths is NOT like reading a question in English you imbecile, there's interpretations of the question, no right answer etc. The Board is only dealing with a problem they themselves created. If you really wanted students to 'think and apply knowledge on their feet,' there are much better ways than screwing over half the state. Off the top of my god damn head: use unseen related material from section one to complete section three... tada?
 
Last edited:

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 4)

Top