Pit Bulls Death Sentence (2 Viewers)

[tattoodguy]

you havent heard of the pound.....and them confiscating dogs who attack ppple and putting them down.

you really take the cake for being a dumb fuck....

there are so many morons on here.........but u manage to distinguish urself as the king of all the BOS dumb fucks.

MORON.

 

[waddle_828]

if all you can do is insult people and call us all dumb fucks and morons
then clearly you are copmletely ignorant to life and thus it is you who is the moron

 

[waddle_828]

Yes clearly, tattoodguy you are a moron, but really i along with a lot of other people knew this before your little thread hijacking hissy fit displayed above.



Awww don’t like it when your entire post no longer makes any sense or have any substance to them, get used to it, because none of your posts do. No offence just stating how it is



Well that’s all well and good After a dog has attacked another 4 year old kid outside the kids house, but really I don’t think that doing something After the dogs are killing and mauling these other people is really the solution considering it keeps happening OVER AND OVER AGAIN, I’m sick of seeing over and over again dog bites on tv and in the papers, and hearing about it from other people, it happens all to often.

Something needs to be done to ensure that in the future is not going to be any more dog bites you dumbass, not after the attacks but now!. proactive not reactive solutions are needed.

I understand this higher order thinking may be a bit to much for you (again, no offence, just stating it from the intelligence shown in your previous posts ) but if you do not understand simply say so, we wont hold it against you, its ok you can admit it now, recognition is your first step to trying to amend your social & general intelligence

Good luck

Murf

continuously well said posts murf
couldn't agree more with you

 

[tattoodguy]

murf and waddle go and fuck each other up the arse.......u fucking poooofters..

so these dogs continuously attack ppple? and kill ppple?

how many ppple in nsw have been killed by these dogs? id say about fuck all.. hardly any..

ur a moron, u see every now and again someone with a bandage who gets bitten by a dog........and u think it always happpens and ppple die all the time etc.........It proves ur stpidity.

In the paper it quoted a local government study or something....

it said pit bullls were like 4th on the list for attacking frequency....and 6th on the list for severity.....

so there not even the worst.................

and those..argintinian fighting dogs etc............i havent heard of any of those attacking anyone.......

Where are the facts -----------

you cheeer for the government...and say good work......but u dont have any grasp of the facts...........u have seeen a couple of stories on the news....about pple being attacked.........but that doesnt prove much.

some pppel probablyl torment dogs.....and deserve to be bitten.

You want to be proactive??????????????/ lets ban alcohol?
lets ban parachauting? we shoudl ban everyting thats dangerous?????
where are you going to draw the line in ur proactive approach?

u spastic.

 

[ogmzergrush]

Both those are victimless crimes, unless alcohol is used mixed with a car etc, but really thats the fault of the driver, and yeah i saw on the news the other day a parachoot dident open and it ended up killing all these people :uhhuh:

Parachuting, a victimless crime? =)

 

[ogmzergrush]

lol if it was criminalised as the genius is suggesting haha lol u get wot i mean lol

Couldn't help myself, I saw all the intelligent debate and it just got too much for me. I thought I'd try to divert things before tattoodguy crushed your argument with his well-reasoned and highly structured line of argument

 

[SashatheMan]

fucking helll...............

this is exactly what im fucking talking about............our fucking government............destroying our freedoms..

what a kneee jerk fucking reaction..... 99.9% of dog owners are responsbile.....................why ruin it..for all the law abiding dog owners..j7ust becuase a few morons............cant control their pets...

its totally unreasonable.

i dont have our problem our government making rules....2 have to muzzle them or put them on leeashes.. etc.........but............completely bannning ownership of these animals.....thats fucking rediculous...

this is jsut another slap in the face to the australian public.

...it makes me sick......

I really can't stand it when you agree with me.

lol . thats funny

i hear thhey are gonna ban pomeranians and jackrussels.

 

[ogmzergrush]

lol . thats funny

i hear thhey are gonna ban pomeranians and jackrussels.

It's true, whenever he does it I always have to stop and ask myself if I'm being a dickhead :/

 

[SashatheMan]

why did they pass this law? cuase someone got attacked? or why now i mean.

my world standards Australia is/becoming the panzies country there is. I reckon all the presidents/Pms in other countriues are laughing at australian softness. We are scared of everytihng these days and just ban it.

 

[tattoodguy]

Lets move back to the topics and curbe the personal abuse......

it distracts us from the issues and doestn help to get our messages accross to each other.

truce?

u say u cant seee a similarity between the dangerous dogs and the alcohol/parachuating etc.

Seee to me the isssue is about personal responsibility.

these dogs in question are ppples pets...if the owners show responsibility..and kept them locked up etc........these incidents would be avoided..........

like wise with alchol consumption --------- if ppple are irresponsible -- ppple can get hurt.

the potential by having both in the commmunity is dangerous in both cases in the wrong hands.

i know that -- we dont seee all the attacks by dogs.....but it would be useful to seee the actual statistics.....

rather than rely on shock tactics in the media of an isolated dog attack here and there.

 

[tattoodguy]

thats better-- if you have a dangerous dog....and it attacks someone......u cant have a dangerous dog again and u should be penalised...

see thats fairer and more reasonable..than the governments heavy handed publicity stunt.

 

[Vangineer]

kill all the dangerous dogs.
they are no good to society

 

[Rorix]

any thread with tattoodguy v anybody is worth reading

 

[waddle_828]

Lets move back to the topics and curbe the personal abuse......

it distracts us from the issues and doestn help to get our messages accross to each other.

truce?

u say u cant seee a similarity between the dangerous dogs and the alcohol/parachuating etc.

Seee to me the isssue is about personal responsibility.

these dogs in question are ppples pets...if the owners show responsibility..and kept them locked up etc........these incidents would be avoided..........

like wise with alchol consumption --------- if ppple are irresponsible -- ppple can get hurt.

the potential by having both in the commmunity is dangerous in both cases in the wrong hands.

i know that -- we dont seee all the attacks by dogs.....but it would be useful to seee the actual statistics.....

rather than rely on shock tactics in the media of an isolated dog attack here and there.

thats the smartest thing ive heard you say in this thread
actually explaining what you mean instead of going on about propaganda
you have some good ideas there

 

[transcendent]

thats better-- if you have a dangerous dog....and it attacks someone......u cant have a dangerous dog again and u should be penalised...

see thats fairer and more reasonable..than the governments heavy handed publicity stunt.

so if the number of dog attacks triples, the number of victims triple. you're allowing the problems to occur before you do anything to fix it. by removing the source of the problem, there'd BE no problem. and this is what the government is doing. personally the tactic they employ is VERY LENIENT! if they really wanted the attacks to stop, they'd have every viscious breed of dog exterminated. but they aren't cause it'd cause an uproar from dog owners. they chose a passive solution, not an aggressive one.

 

[tattoodguy]

transcendent --- are these dog attacks a serious problem.----------where are the facts -------how many ppple are these dogs killing???????

probably none.

its not a serious problem ---- its just a publicity stunt by our politicians...

do you want to have a society transccendent where everything that is dangous is bannned?

What else should we ban?

life is risky --- so fucking what ------ why dont we exterminate aids sufferers?

there are so many people in society who are a risk --to the rest of us---

what races etc......commmit terrorism in the world????????????????? why then doesnt our government put a blanket ban on immigration from these countries?

Fucking hell, on very very very very very rare occasions these dogs give ppple a bite ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,but its not even a serious problem nor a serious risk.....why dont we look at more serious things?


Dont be so fucking weak ---- life is meant to be risky ---- if you are scared of a fucking dog-------------

go wrap urself up and cottton woool and stay home.

Grow up u fucking babies.


The government only did this to score political points -- dogs are such a minor fucking problem dont be so gullible.

serious problems ---- human to human voilence. Alchol, obesity, divorce, stresss.

Why doesnt the government --- ban all alcohol, limit our consumption of fatty fooods by outlawing mcdonalds and kfc etc, outlaw divorce, severly limit our work hours and put cameras on every corner to curb voilence?

Why does the government fail to remedy these very serious problems and concentrate on something so fucking pettty.


of course, i dont think any of these things should be bannned -- nor these dogs ------ people should be free to make their own fucking decisions, but should have to face the consequences.

 

[Korn]

transcendent --- are these dog attacks a serious problem.----------where are the facts -------how many ppple are these dogs killing???????

probably none.

its not a serious problem ---- its just a publicity stunt by our politicians...

do you want to have a society transccendent where everything that is dangous is bannned?

What else should we ban?

life is risky --- so fucking what ------ why dont we exterminate aids sufferers?

there are so many people in society who are a risk --to the rest of us---

what races etc......commmit terrorism in the world????????????????? why then doesnt our government put a blanket ban on immigration from these countries?

Fucking hell, on very very very very very rare occasions these dogs give ppple a bite ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,but its not even a serious problem nor a serious risk.....why dont we look at more serious things?


Dont be so fucking weak ---- life is meant to be risky ---- if you are scared of a fucking dog-------------

go wrap urself up and cottton woool and stay home.

Grow up u fucking babies.


The government only did this to score political points -- dogs are such a minor fucking problem dont be so gullible.

serious problems ---- human to human voilence. Alchol, obesity, divorce, stresss.

Why doesnt the government --- ban all alcohol, limit our consumption of fatty fooods by outlawing mcdonalds and kfc etc, outlaw divorce, severly limit our work hours and put cameras on every corner to curb voilence?

Why does the government fail to remedy these very serious problems and concentrate on something so fucking pettty.


of course, i dont think any of these things should be bannned -- nor these dogs ------ people should be free to make their own fucking decisions, but should have to face the consequences.

wtf i thought u hated immigrants, make up ur mind.
ppl facing the results of their actions doesnt stop the cause of the problem

 

[mishka]

the point is, these dogs were bred to hunt and be savage beasts. they have no place in suburbia.

they were not bred to be pets, and those who have them for "guarding" their property should think about alternatives. society should not have to put up with any vicious dog, which is why they destroy any dog who seriously attacks a human.

once dogs get the taste of blood, they often turn into dangerous animals. not exactly "man's best friend" in this case.

 

[Korn]

the point is, these dogs were bred to hunt and be savage beasts. they have no place in suburbia.

they were not bred to be pets, and those who have them for "guarding" their property should think about alternatives. society should not have to put up with any vicious dog, which is why they destroy any dog who seriously attacks a human.

once dogs get the taste of blood, they often turn into dangerous animals. not exactly "man's best friend" in this case.

Most dogs that have been around along time were bred for the same reason

 

[SashatheMan]

the point is, these dogs were bred to hunt and be savage beasts. they have no place in suburbia.

they were not bred to be pets, and those who have them for "guarding" their property should think about alternatives. society should not have to put up with any vicious dog, which is why they destroy any dog who seriously attacks a human.

once dogs get the taste of blood, they often turn into dangerous animals. not exactly "man's best friend" in this case.

grey hounds were bred for racing, some people own grey hound just as a pet, should they be banned aswell, becuase they dotn belong in suburbia, they belong open spaces. or what about sheep dog, they were bred to gather sheep, they dont belong in suburrbia.


one as for the last line, about tasting blood, yuo were watching too many shark documentories.