ohexploitable
hey
ummm these are pretty much quadratics u do in year 10 lol
Don't confuse them with the i :<.ummm these are pretty much quadratics u do in year 10 lol
Find the value of k:
The remainder is 25 when:
is divided by
I know P(k) = 25 but im unsure what to do after.
Which program/website do you use?ummm these are pretty much quadratics u do in year 10 lol
ThanksThat's probably LaTex
yea...noone answered my questions too hereYes Sir!
a) Since it is Preliminary, Preliminary student's only answer this!
I will start with a basic question.
Express the following fraction in the partial form,
. Where and are constants.
The fraction is
For Preliminary students,
b) The roots of the equation are in the ratio of . Show that
For HSC students, [Sorry this question was on the thread already. Didn't know. Attempt it if you want anyway. No cheating. ]
c) Differentiate with respect to ,
. Hence find the differential coefficient of
[Hint: Don't differentiate normally.]
For HSC students,
d) Show that and hence evaluate
Remarks: HSC students! Don't answer the Preliminary sections! Preliminary students! Attempt HSC questions if you can!
I see little hscishard on page 1.yea...noone answered my questions too here
Make RHS into one fraction then simplify
Use the show part, integrate and use log laws to simplify the answer to
0.5ln[(e+1)^2/e^2+1]
lmao. 10% of my posts are in this threadI see little hscishard on page 1.
It's not that long.For c, I got a pretty long answer...
I'm doubting it's accuracy since I did my working out on a paper that was already full of working out.
I'm pretty this method is correct
let y=x^x^x
Let u=x^x
Take ln on both sides and use implicit differentiation. I doubt this is a mathematics level question
That's not showing, that's telling.yea...noone answered my questions too here
Make RHS into one fraction then simplify
Use the show part, integrate and use log laws to simplify the answer to
0.5ln[(e+1)^2/e^2+1]
I had the last line expanded. It's quite longIt's not that long.
Let
Let
Woops, I didn't see that. I am taking your method during exam time!^ no need for implicit differentiation, it can be done with 2u methods
What happened to the little hscishard on page 1?I had the last line expanded. It's quite long
I'm not bothered showing full working here anymore...too tedious
+1, I remem a question that just asked to differentiate x^x here^ no need for implicit differentiation, it can be done with 2u methods
http://community.boredofstudies.org/showthread.php/219580-What-are-quot-Subject-Lines-quotI see little Ohexploitable on the first page of this thread!