Thats ok Perhaps next time, a better way to say it would be: "Well, as far as I know, if you fail, you fail."Damage Inc. said:Hmm, sorry, I thought it was if you fail, you fail.
(this way, you cover yourself, so that, if such a case arises where you haven't had the right information, you can just say, well, thats what you knew, you aren't the authority on it etc.)
1) Never said it was a feel-good forum, of course its a help forum. But why be mean/disheartening when you don't have to? There are usually better ways of saying things, then just shooting someone down.Generator said:Sometimes you cannot help but be 'heartless' when you are trying to help - this is a help forum, not a feel good forum, after all.
Edit (new text only): My point is that constructive help need not always be heartening or delivered in a long-winded and sugar-coated manner.
2) I apologise for verbosity (if you were referring to me) as it is a bad habit of mine.
3) I'm not trying to sugar-coat anything, but I also fail to see why we should all make the first years feel bad just for the hell of it.
Yeah, thats also another circumstance to which you would be entitled to extra testing. A poor exam result inverse to your assessment results would indicate that something went wrong on the day - or perhaps you just not so good in an exam situation. They give you a second chance at any rate, which is nice of them methinks.cimbom said:Wow- Frank said that the 'acceptable range' mark would be above 40 this semester. If we get below 40% (of the 50) there's retesting, especially if it is inconsitent with our assessment mark (constituting the remaining 50).