Yanco pwn all at dragonskinWhat? Sreious?? I remember PLC at 152, then us at 197. Last year that is. The only school past 400 I can recall is Yanco.
WTH is dragonskin...? something to do with Skyrim??Yanco pwn all at dragonskin
99.85 broHANG ON WHERE'S "OFFICIAL"? what was your ATAR man??
Ho dang, nice going Well I want to beat that Baulko kid who got 495/500 aggregate a few years ago, so the dream is 496/500 hehe.99.85 bro
u aiming for 500 aggregate?
Lol, well good luck with thatHo dang, nice going Well I want to beat that Baulko kid who got 495/500 aggregate a few years ago, so the dream is 496/500 hehe.
Just add up your HSC marks, seeing as though your ATAR is top 10 units (500 marks), you just add up the mark for the 5 subjects you scored highest in. Your aggregate was 477. Holy shite! last year, for 99.95, the minimum aggregate was 472. Dude! If you got 477, that means the overall cohort this year for NSW is way better than last years!!Lol, well good luck with that
how do you know what aggregate you ended up getting anyway
Exact same ATAR.92.45
I was aiming for 90 so I'm feeling wonderful! Congrats all.
nice sample size you got thereJust add up your HSC marks, seeing as though your ATAR is top 10 units (500 marks), you just add up the mark for the 5 subjects you scored highest in. Your aggregate was 477. Holy shite! last year, for 99.95, the minimum aggregate was 472. Dude! If you got 477, that means the overall cohort this year for NSW is way better than last years!!
THIS IS PROOF OF THE FLYNN EFFECT
With new technology and advancement of human knowledge, each subsequent generation of humans has a higher average IQ than the one before.
Damn that means in 1000 years the dumbest kids in school will have IQ's of 180-200........wtf thats unfair
What? Different scaling? Isn't it simple logic that the lowest 99.95'er had an aggregate of 472 last year, therefore if a 477 aggregate got 99.85, even with scaling (Which has a negligible effect for top achieving students) you won't get a difference like that unless the cohorts highest ranked kids were smarter than before.nice sample size you got there
one person being higher than the minimum doesnt imply anything
also, different scaling and etc. i guess
Hmm? Similar theory to me? As in the people this year smarter than last? LOL then Ruse is lagging behind... well you guys will pick up next year for sureI had a theory similar. Though it was the complete opposite lol. @hayabusa
Nooo well actually the retards on this planet are outbreeding the smart people, that's a fact. But the smart one's that remain are getting smarter, if you know what I mean. So we will have VERY smart people in 1000 years time, although they will be a substantial minority against retardates. By then though hopefully the smart one's will figure out how to turn a dumb person into a smart one, so they're not overwhelmed. That's happening right now actually, people are doing experiments with transcranial magnetic stimulation to recreate the effects of high functioning autism, which grants photographic memory and unimaginable mental capacity for information. So an average joe would turn into a super photographic memory genius of spectacular processing power....lol no. mine was the complete opposite, only similar in what the theory was subject to. i though ppl were getting dumber as the generations went on lol. btw im not hsc 2012 im 2013
That's not how it works. It's the aggregate of scaled marks, not HSC marks. Clearly not smarter....Just add up your HSC marks, seeing as though your ATAR is top 10 units (500 marks), you just add up the mark for the 5 subjects you scored highest in. Your aggregate was 477. Holy shite! last year, for 99.95, the minimum aggregate was 472. Dude! If you got 477, that means the overall cohort this year for NSW is way better than last years!!