Originally posted by ZeGoat
if his actions cause so much discomfort to people like you why arent his balls called no-balls because obviously they are clearly visible to be no-balls as you say and if the action is suspicious y doesnt the icc test him again...
1. They are clearly no balls. But like i said the fact that the icc have cleared him (which they shouldn't have) makes it hard for umpires to say no, your wrong. and to make matters worse, following murali's testing, the icc changed the rules on chucking to say something like the arm may bend 10 degrees (ill research that) So if your an umpire, its pretty hard to make a decsion on, to what degree the arm of the bollower has bent (on top of everything else umpires have to do)
2. The umpires should test him again. and then again and again and again. Basically, untill players have confidence in his action, and are sure they are competeing against someone who is not at an unfair advantage. He should be tested every year or 2, or something like that. And they should test him properly, and not only should the icc, and human movement experts be involved, there should be some sort of independent party and some sort of legal party involved. Because at the end of the day (if they do it properly) they will find the guy chucks, and they will have to ban him from playing, ending his career and cash flow.
But like i said, they will never do proper tests, and they will definetely never ban him, because a) they are gutless. b)they are scared c)they are gutless.