Students helping students, join us in improving Bored of Studies by donating and supporting future students!
i reckon... his not a chucker...Originally posted by Seraph
ahh shut your trap hes not a chucker
And zegoat mate , wait till we bat again
btw that was a nice catch the SL batter did when warne accidenlty threw the ball at him
dharmasena and chandana are both genuine bowlers...... what are you goin on about...Originally posted by jayz
apart from murali and vass, r there any other geniune bowlers in the SL team?
murali is legit........ hes bin proven to be....Originally posted by RUB!X
vass is the only good legit action bowler in the whole of Sri Lanka... lol
Originally posted by copious
they have fernando, duno where he is though.
hes injured...Originally posted by RUB!X
oh yeah... that guy... fernando he's alright, i saw him in the last series, he was pretty good... where is he now?
NO!Originally posted by ZeGoat
murali is legit........ hes bin proven to be....
if his actions cause so much discomfort to people like you why arent his balls called no-balls because obviously they are clearly visible to be no-balls as you say and if the action is suspicious y doesnt the icc test him again...Originally posted by how u doin?
NO!
he's proven he CAN bowl legit. not that he DOES bowl legit.
He may have passed tests at the time in the controlled environment, with out match pressure, without bowling his various delivories. And even if he hadn't passed these misleading tests, or if he had failed realistic tests, people like Bob Simpson believe no one would have had the guts to do anything about it.
And now the icc have basically given him permission to chuck (which he does) and his arguement is that he has been cleared in the past, and therefore he doesn't chuck in the presnt, its a joke.
1. They are clearly no balls. But like i said the fact that the icc have cleared him (which they shouldn't have) makes it hard for umpires to say no, your wrong. and to make matters worse, following murali's testing, the icc changed the rules on chucking to say something like the arm may bend 10 degrees (ill research that) So if your an umpire, its pretty hard to make a decsion on, to what degree the arm of the bollower has bent (on top of everything else umpires have to do)Originally posted by ZeGoat
if his actions cause so much discomfort to people like you why arent his balls called no-balls because obviously they are clearly visible to be no-balls as you say and if the action is suspicious y doesnt the icc test him again...