The Exam Preparation Thread (2 Viewers)

ManlyChief

Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2005
Messages
438
Location
Manly: 7 miles from Sydney, 1000 miles from care
Gender
Male
HSC
2002
Ms 12 said:
Cop out :)

But that way they can make the two essay questions worth a nice and round 20 marks each I guess (that is, assuming you had 2 essay questions...)
yeah 2 extended ones ...

why not make each extended one wirth 25?

it seemed such a waste to have only 10 multiple choicers ... not that i wanted any more, but, you know, if they wanted to cop out with the marking, then why not drop one of the extended ones (such as the essay) and have like 30 multiple choice?

bizzare ...

i may write to the dean to vent my displeasure ...
 

santaslayer

Active Member
Joined
May 29, 2003
Messages
7,816
Location
La La Land
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
I finished my exams!!!


yayayyyyy!!




anyway, multi choice is useless if its an open book exam coz answers are easily discovered. law is about application, not straight out memorising, since law changes every now and then.
 

Frigid

LLB (Hons)
Joined
Nov 17, 2002
Messages
6,208
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
santaslayer said:
law changes every now and then.
or every friggin fortnight in the context of torts >.<

why the hell make us learn all these stupid outdated stuff, the old common law precedent, latest common law precedent, post-CLA application >.<
 

Frigid

LLB (Hons)
Joined
Nov 17, 2002
Messages
6,208
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
speaking of exams, I would like to CHALLENGE YOU ALL to this MEGAHUMUNGOEXAM from our good Northern friends at UQ and their lovely publication Obiter. The exam is sourced from Obiter 4, 2004 (pdf).
T.C.Beirne All-In-One-Exam !!

At last, the T.C.Beirne School of Law is proud to present an assessment regime that truly judges your complete competency in law. Never again will you be able to cram Hedley Byrne v Heller, safe in the knowledge that you will never need to remember it again. Never again shall the rule in The Commonwealth v Amann Aviation be a mere trifle in your life. Never again will you need to remember a B or 2B pencil for one of those annoying multi-choice answer sheets. Law lecturers have always enjoyed concocting impossibly intricate hypothetical scenarios that raise an implausibly wide range of pressing legal questions…so why not take the trend to its logical conclusion?

Why not assess an entire law degree on the basis of a single question??
Obiter understands that UQ is set to become the first GO8 University to introduce an All-In-One Examination system. A single marathon exam will truly test your comprehensive understanding of the law, and leave the first three and a half years of your degree completely free for furthering the independent research goals of the School. And for drinking. What’s more, it will do away with the need for most electives altogether.


ALL-IN-ONE EXAMINATION (SAMPLE)

Scenario:
Charles is a fresh-faced final year law student, arriving for his one-and-only law exam. He arrives at university flustered and is unable to quickly find a park in the Green Zone, despite the Union having repeatedly promised more Green Zone parking spaces. He therefore drives into the multi-story carpark. He takes a ticket, which reads:

"UQ Multi-Story Carpark
No liability shall be entertained for any damage on these premises, whatsoever or howsoever caused.

Neither the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) or any other legislation shall apply to any claim arising from this ticket."

Charles is in too much of a hurry to read the ticket, whose relevant conditions had only been added that day. He notices a big red sign with a pointy finger to this effect, but thinks nothing of it. As he climbs out of the car, he sees his friend Sarah. He hands her his law notes, saying “Hold this for a minute for me”. Sarah, however, takes fright from a large water buffalo walking past, and runs away, thinking that she will probably return the notes at some unspecified later point.

She engages the assistance of Bob to help her carry the notes. Bob intends to keep the notes, however. He also believes (wrongly, as it transpires) that a large red dragon is chasing him.

Charles starts walking to the exam, but realising that Sarah had his notes, he panics. In his distress, he hits a fellow student (Suri) over the head with a pencil, makes an obscene gesture at Reid, and proceeds in his panic to deliver a blood transfusion to a Jehovah’s Witness passing by (thus saving her life, and that of her unborn child).

It transpires that the parking ticket was printed on behalf of a subcontracted corporation by a seventeen-year old employee, who had no actual authority to do so. However, the Board of the company thought it was quite amusing, and celebrated by declaring a dividend to ordinary shareholders (but not preference shareholders, who included the company secretary).

A local indigenous group has for many years engaged in traditional activities near the carpark, and their presence is (regrettably) opposed by the relevant corporation, which (for no apparent reason) holds a pastoral lease over the relevant land. The Commonwealth Parliament responds by passing an Act designating the area ‘recognised indigenous land’, and purports to codify the common law development of native title in general. The Act also reserves without remuneration ten (10) free car spaces for local government officials. The officials work part-time for the Department of Defence. Australian forces are currently serving in Iraq.

For his indiscretions, Charles is hauled before the “University of Queensland Court”, a tribunal created under a special by-law for the purpose of hearing this case. The ‘Court’ comprises three Federal Court judges, a part-time Justice of the Peace and a well-tempered golden retriever. By a 2-2 statutory majority (the golden retriever not deciding), the ‘Court’ sentences Charles to death, ‘for having red hair’, and proceeds to redetermine the state’s electoral boundaries to ensure that the Democrats have a majority in the House of Representatives.

At that point, an American warplane flies over and, mistaking the scene below for a Taliban wedding, bombs the area. The new UQ-CSIRO biotechnology laboratories are struck, spreading germs across the border to a New South Wales potato farm. New South Wales statute imposes a $20 000 limitation of liability for cases of potato blight.

Question:
Advise every party on all of their rights and liabilities, under common law, statute, the Constitution and, where applicable, any rules of customary international law.
Do not consider issues of constructive trust, the definition of ‘Cur adv vult’, the rule in Foss v Harbottle or application to the Cocos (Keeling) Islands. Provide detailed discussion of all other issues arising. Include a feminist critique of your answer.

Permitted Time: 12 hours
 
Last edited:

MiuMiu

Somethin' special....
Joined
Nov 7, 2002
Messages
4,329
Location
Back in the USSR
Gender
Female
HSC
2003
That is GOLD!

The sad thing was that I was reading through it actually doing the exam in my head!
 

MoonlightSonata

Retired
Joined
Aug 17, 2002
Messages
3,645
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
Frigid said:
why the hell make us learn all these stupid outdated stuff, the old common law precedent, latest common law precedent, post-CLA application >.<
You know full well that statute is the tip of the iceberg

Common law underpins everything! Imagine if you only learnt the statutory provisions and Iemma scrapped the CLA tomorrow. What then!

Make sure you're in Cathy Sherry's property class next year. You will benefit from things such as her "blender theory" of law and equity and other such nice metaphors.
 

ManlyChief

Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2005
Messages
438
Location
Manly: 7 miles from Sydney, 1000 miles from care
Gender
Male
HSC
2002
MoonlightSonata said:
You know full well that statute is the tip of the iceberg

Common law underpins everything! Imagine if you only learnt the statutory provisions and Iemma scrapped the CLA tomorrow. What then!
Common law is, in my opinion, the only law worth recognising. I totally dismiss the authority of statute and any claim to legislative potency the parliament may advance. As far as I am concerned, the parliament should only every be allowed to vote on money bills and the appointment of Her Majesty's ministers and to express, at the appropriate moments, their confidence or lack thereof in those ministers.

The judiciary has a far greater claim to legislative authority - in my view - because they are rational, intelligent, sombre (and usually sober) and have been doing it for much, much longer than these pesky parliaments. Furthermore, the judiciary is less likely to be influence by the moronic drones that comprise the general public in this counrty. You can have good laws, or you can have popular democracy. :)

I'm off lunch now, play nice :)
love and hugs from the beachside,
MC xoxoxox
 

neo o

it's coming to me...
Joined
Aug 16, 2002
Messages
3,294
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Finished with contracts! Unfortunately, in one of my questions I "moved beyond" what the question wanted me to do (unconsciability) and talked about fraudulent misrepresentation. Whoops! :rolleyes:
 

BillytheFIsh

Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2005
Messages
106
Location
Brisbane
Gender
Male
HSC
2001
Woot...

Just finished my final LLB exam about... oh.... 27 hours ago.

And yes. I did just stop drinking :p
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)

Top