We made a mistake with Rudd, didn't we? (1 Viewer)

[Lauchlan]

didn't even read the answer did u?

i think both parties and both candidates are complete shit so it seriously does come down to who is going to be less economically socialist

it comes down to you just ignorantly picking the same party each time, ignoring everything else that would suggest you do otherwise.

 

[scuba_steve2121]

im not talking about that specific issue.

im asking why should, for example 1 billion dollars be removed from public hospitals and used elsewhere. most people use public hospitals.

it was taken out and put into private health rebates so to attract more people to private health insurance because the government knew that the public health system is shit and no amount of money can ever fix it.

 

[scuba_steve2121]

it comes down to you just ignorantly picking the same party each time, ignoring everything else that would suggest you do otherwise.

lol well if Labour suddenly becomes more right wing in their economic policies then it will be Kevin for 2010 but atm its Abbot for 2010

 

[Lauchlan]

it was taken out and put into private health rebates so to attract more people to private health insurance because the government knew that the public health system is shit and no amount of money can ever fix it.

which is why it needs to be reformed - rudd agrees, even abbott agrees (he has for years)... the real issue here is what it is reform into - both have variation of the same reform put in place. so yes, money is used here and i think you are going a bit far to say money wont help the reform.

 

[Lauchlan]

lol well if Labour suddenly becomes more right wing in their economic policies then it will be Kevin for 2010 but atm its Abbot for 2010

wow, your off to a great start, you cant even spell his name - its Abbott.

i dont care who you vote for. its you opinion whichname should be against 2010*

*btw you should use 2011 (close enough, by the time we vote Labor back in it will be Kevin 2011) - it sounds better.

lol

 

[scuba_steve2121]

which is why it needs to be reformed - rudd agrees, even abbott agrees (he has for years)... the real issue here is what it is reform into - both have variation of the same reform put in place. so yes, money is used here and i think you are going a bit far to say money wont help the reform.

basic capitalist economic law says that public enterprise will always be fucking shit. because they are excused from the laws of supply and demand. thus no matter the amount of inflation increasing money you pump in there it will always be shitter then the private health system NO MATTER WHAT

you know what would be a good reform privatising the health care system ey?

 

[scuba_steve2121]

wow, your off to a great start, you cant even spell his name - its Abbott.

i dont care who you vote for. its you opinion whichname should be against 2010*

*btw you should use 2011 (close enough, by the time we vote Labor back in it will be Kevin 2011) - it sounds better.

lol

so you have gone from I'm ignorant to its my choice and opinion?

 

[funkshen]

monopolies will be shit... because they are excused from the laws of individual firms facing a perfectly elastic supply schedule (in perfect competition)

fixed that for you brah.

 

[Lentern]

hes not sounding to eco liberal to me bagging out Milton?

I'm more bewildered by the social conservative tag. I'm not some keeper of the Iron flame he kicked me out of the club because i was too progressive.

 

[Lolsmith]

Jesus Christ this thread turned to shit.

 

[postnatal]

do you ever sleep?

 

[Lolsmith]

Yeah...

Just get distracted, is all.

 

[Lentern]

Jesus Christ this thread turned to shit.

You mean to say a thread titled "We made a mistake with Rudd, didn't we?" ever had potential?

 

[scuba_steve2121]

fixed that for you brah.

firstly monopoly on what and secondly who gives a fuck

 

[mirakon]

im awaiting an answer to my question, fool - which you so noticeably are neglecting to reproduce. i wonder why?

You honestly think I'll be fucked to post the thing again just to have it ignored again just because you're too much of a sissy to reply? I mean threads later it is somewhat out of cotnext. Nevertheless I don't mind rubbing it in so I will re-post it just so you can make more of an embarrassment of yourself

@Lauchlan

Health and education are also state government issues. It was not so much Howard's responsibility as it was the STATE GOVERNMENTS' responsibilities to address these issues.

 

[e-four]

No, we didn't make a mistake.

Howard didn't do much to advance Australia, but held us back.

End of story.

 

[scuba_steve2121]

No, we didn't make a mistake.

Howard didn't do much to advance Australia, but held us back.

End of story.

a man with the bushiest eye brows ever was reelected 4 times for 'holding us back'

 

[SnowFox]

a man with the bushiest eye brows ever was reelected 4 times for 'holding us back'

The man was elected, the caterpillars syphoning his brain through his eye brows controlled him in the background.

 

[scuba_steve2121]

The man was elected, the caterpillars syphoning his brain through his eye brows controlled him in the background.

haha totally :rofl:

 

[Lauchlan]

basic capitalist economic law says that public enterprise will always be fucking shit. because they are excused from the laws of supply and demand. thus no matter the amount of inflation increasing money you pump in there it will always be shitter then the private health system NO MATTER WHAT

you know what would be a good reform privatising the health care system ey?

in a way i agree with you, but on other levels i disagree.