Newbie said:
funny observation how most people here who are hot and bothered about it are guys. i guess our egos are kinda bruised hehe
anyway im on the woman's side, simply because
"He tried to steal money and he fucked up"
That's a pretty messed up interpretation - ego bruising. I guess some people here are trying to be objective, and then there are others such as steph@nie and yourself who think it's ok to take legal matters into your own hands, but cannot justify
why - self defence? Revenge? Humour us.
Just because she could not defend herself from the knuckledusters does not give her sufficient reason to react by shooting him, especially when he is getting away and using the "self-defence" excuse/reason, which implies she was under immediate threat when she was shot, which she wasn't..
steph@nie said:
Let me suggest something to you, go and read up on the story and her injuries etc, before you come back and make an idiot of yourself yet again.
People like you make me sick. The fact that you don't care that she killed him, but rather you're totally absorbed with her killing him with gun, shows how ignorant you are and your thug mentality. It was his fault, if he didn't try to steal the money, he wouldn't of ended up with a bullet through his head.
Haha, you really think you're something don't you steph@nie.
You go off on a tangent (that tattood guy didn't like the fact he was killed with a
gun), instead of arguing your point as to why it's ok that she killed an unarmed man when he was getting away and she was under no threat.
True, if he didn't try to steal the money he wouldn't be dead, but that is as ignorant as saying if x female didn't go out clubbing that night and trust that man, she wouldn't have been raped.
At least give us reasons why she was justified in doing what she did, instead of just reacting to tattood guys posts.. all I've heard so far is "he tried to steal money and he fucked up" - which doesn't amount to anything. and isn't a reason or justification, just an aimless statement.