The Mathew Johns Sex scandal. (2 Viewers)

[katie tully]

All that Matthw Johns did, was have a lapse in concentration and have sex with some chick whilst married.

He doesn't owe anybody other than his wife an apology, which he made 7 years ago.

This has caused undue pressure on his wife, his children (who are now old enough to read newspapers) and his career. He had consensual sex with a woman, and left the situation after the others entered the room. He had no obligation to tell them to stop, unless she made it clear that she wanted them to stop.

The original investigation says that she was encouraging them all to have sex with her. This has nothing to do with Johns.

 

[jb_nc]

okay now show me the part where it says that participating in a gang bang has an aura of latent homosexuality

why so defensive

how many gang bangs have you been in

 

[katie tully]

I'll be honest hey. I don't care much for football, or footballers, but as a general principal it makes me pretty angry to see an innocent guy get fucked over because it's socially unacceptable to question alleged sexual assaults.

 

[squiresshane990]

why so defensive

how many gang bangs have you been in

at least 6

because some guy has lost his job because some skank took offense to being treated like a skank

 

[jb_nc]

at least 6

because some guy has lost his job because some skank took offense to being treated like a skank

reminder: a private employer has a right to terminate an employee for whatever reason they think is necessary at any time

welcum 2 da free market

 

[katie tully]

dude, dude there is definitely something inherently homosexual about wanting to put your dick in a hole that some other dude has sprogged in

but whatever

 

[squiresshane990]

reminder: a private employer has a right to terminate an employee for whatever reason they think is necessary at any time

welcum 2 da free market

i completely understand 9s reaction

ok

im more pissed off at how the media can make something out of nothing such as, he did nothing illegal, so where the fuck is the actual story.

 

[squiresshane990]

dude, dude there is definitely something inherently homosexual about wanting to put your dick in a hole that some other dude has sprogged in

but whatever

um how

whats the difference between that and rooting some chick after she had sex with someone else a week ago. arbitrary time limits and shitt

and whats gay about watching the next guy, how is that different to watching a porno lol?

 

[jb_nc]

i completely understand 9s reaction

ok

im more pissed off at how the media can make something out of nothing such as, he did nothing illegal, so where the fuck is the actual story.

RL is trying to promote a more family and women friendly sport.

To do this, generally, having emotionally scarring gang bangs as a core team building exercise is not a good thing. Also glassing your girlfriend is a bad idea too. So is walking into some random girl's room and groping her.

Therefore, being a participant is one of these gang bangs is not good either.

So, if you hold a position of prominence in the NRL and have been a party to a gang bang, you can probably expect this shit to hit the fan.

 

[katie tully]

um how

whats the difference between that and rooting some chick after she had sex with someone else a week ago. arbitrary time limits and shitt

and whats gay about watching the next guy, how is that different to watching a porno lol?

When the sprog is still leaking out and he sticks his doodle in and gets other man jizz on his knob

How is that arousing

 

[squiresshane990]

yes thats pretty disgusting

arbitrary time limits though

arbitrary

 

[whatashotbyseve]

RL is trying to promote a more family and women friendly sport.

To do this, generally, having emotionally scarring gang bangs as a core team building exercise is not a good thing. Also glassing your girlfriend is a bad idea too. So is walking into some random girl's room and groping her.

Therefore, being a participant is one of these gang bangs is not good either.

So, if you hold a position of prominence in the NRL and have been a party to a gang bang, you can probably expect this shit to hit the fan.

If this had happened seven days ago, yes. But seven years?

 

[jb_nc]

If this had happened seven days ago, yes. But seven years?

Dude was 30 and married.

Should have known better

 

[kingbigboyjames]

seriously guys, does anyone care?

 

[whatashotbyseve]

I care that some guy has lost his job over trial by media. The police have already cleared him of charges seven years ago. I don't think allegedly damaging the image of the game is enough to crucify him.

 

[kingbigboyjames]

Who is the ACA host?

 

[blue_chameleon]

Who is the ACA host?

TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTracy Grimshaawwwwwwwwwww.

She's obviously OTT, but not to the extent of Leila McKinnons interview of that Corey guy.

 

[kingbigboyjames]

TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTracy Grimshaawwwwwwwwwww.

Hope she fucking gets gang banged. Then she will figure out the difference between consensual group sex and fucking gang rape.

 

[Yomo]

If this had happened seven days ago, yes. But seven years?

The whole ACA bullshit and the ridiculous amount of media covereage is excessive for 7 years ago.. but the actual 4 corners report wasn't just about Johns, it was about the prevalence of this kind of behaviour within the sport. Johns is just the scapegoat for the bigger issue. Even for 7 years ago a report into sex in footy culture is warranted, the media reaction it got is slightly off the point and excessive. But people are talking about it, it's an issue which is now going to be dealt with more strongly, so the initial report did what it meant to do, show society that this kind of thing happens and that is predominately in footy culture

 

[squiresshane990]

The whole ACA bullshit and the ridiculous amount of media covereage is excessive for 7 years ago.. but the actual 4 corners report wasn't just about Johns, it was about the prevalence of this kind of behaviour within the sport. Johns is just the scapegoat for the bigger issue. Even for 7 years ago a report into sex in footy culture is warranted, the media reaction it got is slightly off the point and excessive. But people are talking about it, it's an issue which is now going to be dealt with more strongly, so the initial report did what it meant to do, show society that this kind of thing happens and that is predominately in footy culture

what kind of behaviour? consensual group sex?