How do you write good 'bullshit'? You find a technique and extrapolate every possible point you can possibly construe to link to belonging. I got 14.5/15 raw for section 1 in the actual HSC. And I did absolutely none of this 'practice' stuff you are all talking about - it might work for you, but whatever floats your boat.
For example, this is my 3/3 response for 1d in the Paper 1 of the 2010 HSC:
"The speaker uses imagery and language to illustrate their dissatisfaction with how the family photo album 'records' their belonging. The tone is set with words such as 'the camera's indifferent gaze' and 'falsify appearances' as its tone of voice is that of annoyance perhaps - and the powerful image at the end of 'burned the negatives' is a powerful one to illustrate the emotional felt and this need to get a 'true account', which allowed the 'abridgement of their lives'. Other marks of strong tone-setting language include 'Tinny laughter echoes / from the staged scene on an artificial / beach', use of 'tinny', 'staged' and 'artificial' present resounding echoes to the reader's mind of how fake the portraits or pictures are.
Juxtaposition of that ideal with the non-inclusion of 'evidence of aimless nights' or 'wilderness of ourselves' present powerful undertones of a sad reality that is portrayed falsely with ideals. The line 'no pictures of our... lost intentions' also add to this effect of falsity in the supposed 'record' of their 'life', thus the burning of those which did not give a true account."
What I gather from that is:
- very close reference to the text given
- extrapolation of techniques and THE EFFECT IT HAS ON THE READER AND HOW IT RELATES TO BELONGING AS A WHOLE
- bullcrapping