it asked for 3 significant events
i did differently 2 every1
i did:
1. His childhood was a significant event in his life that formed his personality as an indifferent technocrat
2. His university whatevs - teachings of oswald spengler and the tutelage of heinrich tessenow coupled with the economic failings of weimar which disillusioned himself with the current regime
3. Hitler's speech and rally at his institiution - enraptured by the oratory skills of hitler and his promise to revive germany... initiated his redirection of career as he joined the nskk
these 3 events were interlinked and culminated into his interaction with the nazi party
---
most people spoke about his time as minister for armaments and archictectural contributions
but do u think my 3 events are valid enough?
they are different to about 90% of the state (i reckon) - would this work in my favour?
i found the Failure of the weimar difficult... if you've seen the question...
Source = Confidentish
Germany = (TOV) = failure of democracy = 10 pages... = i thought it was well written.. but then again i feel i fucked it
Speer = (a) - 4, (b) - 5
Conflict in Europe = (LON) = 8 pages... so worried... :/ haha
wow I can't believe you actually made up cases in legal studies.. did you find out what your raw marks were? did you make them up in the trial? if so, what did you get for your trials?
If you get 40% raw in the exam that would maybe align to a 65 maybe (really not too sure). In that case, you would need an internal mark of 95 to get 80.
well lets just say I manage to merely achieve 40% for the exam.... how badly would that affect my chances of getting a band 4? and I'd say that probably the top 20 students in my cohort actually perform alright... the rest.. not so much. So I'm really worried! I wanted to achieve a band 5 for math so bad.. biut guess not anymore!... Also, even if my internal raw is 80% and my ranks 16/60 ... because its gen math, wouldnt that get aligned down?