Search results

Either 3D trig or Projectile motion for one part, Induction or binomial theorem for the other.

I thought the test was long but most parts were fairly easy. 1-4 were fine apart from the eccentricity bit in Q4. I could only get e<a/b or something like that. 5-6 were very time consuming but I got through both. Q7 couldn't do the show that s/u<r/p part. Question 8(a) took me a while so I...

Yeah, I only used it to check the answer in 6b (v). You think BoS is trying to send a message?

I hope you all get your desired marks. All the best everyone.

k, i'll tackle this question since its this thread is getting pretty dead: K, here's a question from my trial: Question 5 a) Show that sin (sin-1x-cos-1x)=2x2-1 b) Hence solve sin-1x-cos-1x=sin-1(5x-4)

How can you compare the two if you have no idea what In the Wild is about? The question practically stated the main theme of the prescribed texts (well Malouf/Wordsworth anyway)

induction for me, followed by an application of the result. I always find those ones very simple while probability questions early in the paper are always so difficult.

I'd hate to be pedantic, but with that question I'd just say the area is equal to a sphere and work from there. But, I think I'd just rotate the x and y axes (if you know what I mean) to X and Y, and use those references. I don't think we'll get a question like that.

Thank god i didn't apply for med. Then i might be feeling some stress right now

Question was a bit strange, but still general. Pretty happy using WW/Malouf on this question, but didn't write fast enough to get all my points in.

This question fit really well with my texts. First time I saw it I thought "I'm dead" but it ended up being a fairly good essay i think.

Wrote 7 pages of bullshit on Lincoln, Havel and Keating. For Keating I practically said "Keating similarly uses ______" for all the Lincoln stuff.

Yeah, I'd only prepared for two as well, but I'm doing speeches. I practically just said that Keating used all the same stuff as Lincoln but I practically just did an essay using 2: Havel and Lincoln. It was a pretty good question for speeches though.

I need 80 for my top preference but i would prefer 99.95 for the University of Sydney scholarship :D

As soon as I saw the title of this thread i thought 1989 too. Dumbest question ever.

For what its worth, I'm turning 17 in December, even though a lot of people in here are still younger than me.

Damm, I had no clue it was a brain. I used the hand pointing to his head for that one anyway. Overall, pretty easy texts. The art review was easy to get techniques out of (language, imagery, similies, paradox etc.)

i think it will be esterification but hoping it will be molar heat of combustion or sulfate in fertiliser because they're the easiest to answer to.

Did anyone get 100% in any extension 1 trials recently? I know someone did in 1991 but that was a while ago.

Gluons (ie the particles which hold the protons and neutrons together)