i thought it was harder than last years..
i didnt finish so i got 5/12 for q10 :( which makes me sad coz i knew what i was doing
if i manage 90/120 for this paper i'd be over the moon
i dont like maths.
what do u reckon??
i think it was... maybe coz im a *time payments* person (er) so i would have done better last year
:( i didnt finish so i only managed 5/12 marks for q10
i hate myself
i didn't finish :( so i only got 5/12 marks for q10
some parts were hard.. plus i was sleepy...
i'd be over the moon if i managed to get 90/120 marks..
i'm not a maths person.
i got special provisions coz im a type 1 diabetic...never even used them before this coz i didnt know i was entitled
basically, i just get separate supervision, n i can ask the supervisor to stop the time if i feel dizzy (due to low blood sugar levels) or to check my blood glucose reading...
i found the exam to be alrite, some parts were pretty easy.. i studied quite a bit for chem
altho i realize now that ive lost a couple of marks due to stupid mistakes.. (like in mult choice)..which is pretty typical of me
i absolutely hated it..
but what i dont understand is how could ppl write the whole response without using the personal pronoun??
doesnt it ask specifically for your interpretation, not a summary of different readings?? i dunno..
neways my response was prettty crap, i discussed 2 scenes from...
hmm well i just put that bacteria can survive in a limited pH range..and therefore acids can be added as food preservatives because they change the pH of their environment and thus kill the bacteria and extend shelf life blah blah
i understand what ur saying abt quality over quantity, but that doesn't necessarily mean that ppl who wrote long essays didnt write quality ones..
i just don't see the point in putting ppl down like that