Search results

lol yer that's the one, I wouldn't recommend it lol

lol okai I get the distance one, if you apply the same concept to the x and y one would be what you concluded before, but >>>>>>>>>> possible wrong answer in the textbook maybe ??

hmm it's from that orange textbook the 3U one, ahhhhhh I've been on this question for so long now

answer was 3y = x and PA = 2PB what you said made sense but wtf o____o lol

really doesn't matter if you don't get good marks, as long as you try your best that's what's important

you a,b,c are non-captalised which represent the sides, which A,B,C represent the angles for each angle, ie. A, the side which is opposite facing the angle would be a, likewise for b,B and c,C pairs

double check

okai simple question but the wording gets me confused XD, find the locus if its distance from the y-axis is three times the distance from the x-axis would this be 3y=x or y=3x also point p(x,y) is the locus of a point moves in such a way that its distance from a(3,1) is always twice its...

http://www.boredofstudies.org/mirror/2004/2004_Maths2u_T_CSSA_q.pdf there ^ hmm

hmm I got 80% in the trials (91/120), was a good paper

anyone know where they sell them, the ones with exact values on it, though I could memorise it, it better to be sure

ahhh catholic trials got me 91/120, heaps of silly mistakes (teachers marking mistakes) lol j/k j/k, though I hope to get some where over 90 too

in shipwrecks there was that electrolysis half equations, then ahhhhhhhhhhhh faraday so annoying

err for me advantages oxgenated fuel - complete combustion - reduce pollutants renewable - fermentation varies ways to be produced - hydration, fermentation petrol-ethanol blend reduce toxic emissions by 30% in the atmosphere disadvantages engines need modification low heat of...

these two basically sums up what I wrote too

it was a good question, two pages with my big writing though

okai then that's all right

hmm I did the same as Zepplin and lukebennet, calculate the original mass of copper within that solution, then subtract with the mass of the deposit, then work out new mole hence the concentration

lol in the trials, the same thing happened to me though in the opposite way, it was a reactive metal in a electrolytic solution of a weaker metal and what was the expected observation, I wrote precipitate formed on the bottom of the container, through it should be deposit formed which made me...

what was the question again, did it ask you to define or give examples