Search results

Nope Yes, but conventionally the conical flask contains the unknown solution and the burette delivers the known solution, hence you should do it this way.

Poor explanation. What's with the hydrates? Shouldn't even be talking about that if we're looking at an aqueous reaction.

Yup, then just do it normally with fundamental theroem.

What's the derivative of e^x? What's the derivative of e^(ax+b)? Now, can you deduce what the integral of e^(3x-4) is?

Dropped like 5 marks on both my phys/chem test /50... :( More to come. Lost my 2nd/1st rankings respectively (probably)

Nope, your one is just long (even redundant). It's just what carrot said: angles subtended from same arc are equal. This only applies to circles so therefore ABCD must be cyclic. Also... IT IS a "circle" geo thereom so...

Your confusion is not because chemistry is confusing, but because you lack understanding. Let me help you understand. Enthalpy change (ΔH) has to do with the energy content of products and reactants in a reaction (ΔH = energy of products - energy of reactants). Thus, it follows that this...

uh......... obviously OP is talking about a generator.

nope

Just woke up and read this for brain food. Your expression feels very static and thus the protagonist's voice seems unauthentic (need more show and less tell!). Examples in your first paragraph: "I felt a wave of peace... I let myself surrender to it... Then I felt longing" Then I had much...

why is sec theta > 1? I thought diagrams were just like... guidelines. Just because P is in first quadrant shouldn't mean there is a restriction on theta?

For the first one, the argument that an object can never reach the speed of light is based purely off of mass dilation (no textbook mentions mass energy equivalence; hence why i said ignore it). Also, the energy input is not consistent in both frames (explicitly said by my teacher who has a phd...

Hi, I need help understanding special relativity. Argument: An object approaching the speed of light will increase in mass. Thus, additional energy is required to speed up the object and as its mass approaches infinitely, the energy required approaches infinite. Hence, the object cannot reach...

I don't like how it says "It is then allowed to go back to it's original shape" which creates confusion.

eddy currents LOL good one hahaha

Dispersion forces + dipole-dipole interactions

It's quite intuitive. Or use a calculator

A curve y is concave up if y" > 0, and concave down if y " < 0

If you look at the back of the HSC periodic table, 1 mole of any gas at 101.3 kPa & 25deg occupies 24.47 L

The magnet initially had 0 KE. It gained 0.72J in KE. But this must have come from GPE. However, it lost 0.98 J of GPE. Where did that extra 0.26 J go?