COPY PASTA SUM WEBSIET BACKED UP BY DAVID RAY GRIFFIN, PHD IN THEOLOGY HURRRRRRRRRRrrr
# The Report fails to acknowledge that no steel-framed high-rise building has ever collapsed due to fires.
Fires and an 747 being slammed into it, not really the most common scenario anyway?
# The Report fails to mention the total collapse of 47-story steel-framed skyscraper Building 7 at 5:20 on the day of the attack.
I believe building 7 is for a later edition?
# The Report contains no mention of the interview in which the owner of Building 7 states that he and the Fire Department decided to "pull" Building 7 -- an apparent admission of a conspiracy to destroy the building and its contents.
Jesus christ because that's total bunk? How is it an admission of a conspiracy lol
# The Report fails to mention the rapid removal and recycling of the structural steel from the collapsed World Trade Center buildings, even to make excuses for it.
I believe a SHITLOAD of it is still being kept in a massive warehouse and being looked over? You don't need 100%
# The Report makes no mention of a statement by then-Mayor Rudolph Giuliani to Peter Jennings indicating he had foreknowledge of the collapses: "We were operating out of there when we were told that the World Trade Center was gonna collapse, and it did collapse before we could get out of the building."
hahahah foreknowledge? Someone obviously told him that it was likely it was going to collapse, several of the firefighters in there were worried about it so it's not like it required someone 'in on it' to tell him it was probably going to collapse.
# The Report contains no mentions of eyewitness accounts of explosions preceding the collapse of South Towers.
Well even if it doesn't... it's nothing special to imagine a building which has several floors on fire would be having explosions etc.
# The Report fails to mention that George W. Bush's brother, Marvin Bush, and his cousin, Wirt Walker III, were principals in the company that had the contract to provide security for the World Trade Center, Stratesec, nor does it mention the company.
The bush family are very rich and very well connected... I would be surprised if someone in the bush family wouldn't have at some point in their life had been associated with a company associated with the world trade center.
# The Report makes no mention of the fact that a new lessor took control of the World Trade Center complex just six weeks before the attack, obtained an insurance policy covering terrorist attacks, and successfully sued the insurance companies to obtain twice the multi-billion-dollar value of the policy.
How is this important? Are you claiming that it was an insurance job? Holy shit... an organisation which can pull off a stunt like this DOES NOT NEED money. Also, I'm not going to research it myself but I imagine that contracts covering terrorism would be standard for a high profile building like the WTC, especially considering it had been the victim of an attempted attack before.
# The Report repeats the list of 19 suspects identified by the FBI within days of the attack, while failing to mention that six of them reported themselves alive after the attack.
My understanding of this is that the FBI got mixed up with some of the names... there was more than one muhammed blahblah in America. Not a huge surprise.
# The Report fails to mention any of the reports of behavior by the alleged hijackers before the attack that belie the official story that they were devout Muslims on a suicide mission for Allah.
Fair enough it's probably overstated how much they were religious fundamentalists... they're probably better described as out for revenge with nationalistic motives (i.e. US occupation of their lands).
# The Report fails to mention that the published passenger lists contained no Arab names -- a fact publicized by skeptics of the official story.
These were done as a memorial, so obviously you don't want to publish the perpetrators names next to victims.
# The Report fails to ask why the plane that crashed into the Pentagon was not stopped by anti-aircraft missile batteries that presumably ring the building.
There were none there until after 9/11.
# The Report fails to mention that no credible footage of the Pentagon attack has been made public, despite public knowledge that the FBI seized footage of the attack from nearby businesses.
Actually heaps of the footage has been handed over in the past to I believe a court and the judge and/or jury went through the videos and picked out those that showed anything even slightly interesting. In these 3 or 4 videos many of them don't even show much of anything interesting... so I imagine the other 30 are a real borefest.
BUT THEN THE COURTS ARE IN ON IT TOO!!!
# The Report does not ask why the Secret Service did not obtain air cover for the President's motorcade from the Sarasota school to the airport, nor for Air Force One, which took off at about 9:54, until about 11:10.
idk maybe because any other plane in the air was to be shot down anyway?
# The Report avoids mentioning several reports that government officials and business leaders received warnings and avoided targets of the attacks, including:
* A warning by the FBI advising Attorney General John Ashcroft to avoid flying on commercial airlines.
* The report that Pentagon officials suddenly canceled travel plans the evening before the attack.
* The cancellation of plans by Ariel Sharon to attend an event in New York City on 9/11/01.
* A warning to San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown to avoid flying.
* The grounding of Salman Rushdie by Scotland Yard.
These warnings happen ALL THE TIME.
sigh fuck this garbage.
