Bar (2 Viewers)

[melsc]

here we go again *starts yelling *fight fight fight**

 

[xeuyrawp]

here we go again *starts yelling *fight fight fight**

Nah, there's no fight, I can't read what he says

I'm sure he'll just say "you want to be an SC and have never done a law subject, you're a wanker, you're poor, I'm a spoiled little brat" etc etc.

 

[melsc]

Nah, there's no fight, I can't read what he says

I'm sure he'll just say "you want to be an SC and have never done a law subject, you're a wanker, you're poor, I'm a spoiled little brat" etc etc.

Fight anyway I am bored... and sick of the word journey grrr...

 

[stamos]

No, he's an arrogant wanker, who has no touch on the real world where people work and pay for their place. Not only that, he didn't make it into USyd and had a big cry about it.

yeah sometime's he's definitely a jerk

but at other times i reckon a few people are jealous of his drive, and annoyed that they have to compete with people who devote their entire life to their career

edit: sometimes*

 

[melsc]

yeah sometime's he's definitely a jerk

but at other times i reckon a few people are jealous of his drive, and annoyed that they have to compete with people who devote their entire life to their career

I don't see a problem with passion and determination, I prefer people to be dedicated to their chosen career, i'd much prefer to be competing for a place in law with those who really want to do it, but he like many others on bos can be really nice and other times drive me mad

 

[MoonlightSonata]

hbahbha moonlight trolling

Why do people keep saying that!!1

 

[stamos]

maybe if you got out from under that bridge we'd take you more seriously

 

[xeuyrawp]

...well I know you are not a troll. I'm just throwing ideas around

Careful, he'll throw you around.

 

[MoonlightSonata]

What does this have to do with the bar?

http://outpostnine.com/editorials/teacher1.html

Wrong thread.

 

[melsc]

so who of you guys wanna go to the bar? if not what do u wanna do with ur degree?

 

[Frigid]

if not what do u wanna do with ur degree?

change the world. end poverty. impress chix. rewrite a general principle for the tort of negligence.

no, seriously, i dun really know. i do wanna impress chix tho

 

[stamos]

tapping the gold digger market?

 

[xeuyrawp]

tapping the gold digger market?

Well, it is the biggest market in the female global market.

 

[Meads]

I've always wanted to join the Bar, and help society. But in the past year I have matured and now I seem to have more interest in becoming CEO of some global corporation and fucking up society instead. lol ironic.

 

[melsc]

no, seriously, i dun really know. i do wanna impress chix tho

Well I am sure it will work, all u need is a nice business card, flash suit, car and briefcase

See even thought I want to be a lawyer myself, I still want to date one

 

[Frigid]

See even thought I want to be a lawyer myself, I still want to date one

do i read that as an offer or as an illusory promise?

LOL bahahhahaa... i'm such a lawgeek

 

[melsc]

do i read that as an offer or as an illusory promise?

LOL bahahhahaa... i'm such a lawgeek

Don't use words I havent learnt yet its not fair

the moral of the story is "girls dont like boys girls like cars and money"

 

[Frigid]

the moral of the story is "girls dont like boys girls like cars and money"

bahahaha *falls over laughing*

but for your HSC, you could be reading Patterson and Hefferson, Contract Cases and Materials by now...

in other news, i am preparing my 'wrongful life' moot, the crux of which is this:

"the plaintiff cannot say, 'but for your negligence, i would have been born uninjured'. the plaintiff can only say, 'but for your negligence, i would have not been born'."

this one's a tad difficult and is suspectible of crossing to philosophical and ethical boundaries. yes, i will quote Blackstone and Socrates etc.

 

[MoonlightSonata]

bahahaha *falls over laughing*

but for your HSC, you could be reading Patterson and Hefferson, Contract Cases and Materials by now...

in other news, i am preparing my 'wrongful life' moot, the crux of which is this:

"the plaintiff cannot say, 'but for your negligence, i would have been born uninjured'. the plaintiff can only say, 'but for your negligence, i would have not been born'."

this one's a tad difficult and is suspectible of crossing to philosophical and ethical boundaries. yes, i will quote Blackstone and Socrates etc.

You're lucky you're not in my court, you big bad company you!

 

[melsc]

bahahaha *falls over laughing*

but for your HSC, you could be reading Patterson and Hefferson, Contract Cases and Materials by now...

in other news, i am preparing my 'wrongful life' moot, the crux of which is this:

"the plaintiff cannot say, 'but for your negligence, i would have been born uninjured'. the plaintiff can only say, 'but for your negligence, i would have not been born'."

this one's a tad difficult and is suspectible of crossing to philosophical and ethical boundaries. yes, i will quote Blackstone and Socrates etc.

You see I have to neglect my legal studies today as tomorrow I am "journeying" to the AOS trial...legal is on tuesday...looks like I'll be cramming the course in less than a day!