withoutaface
Premium Member
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2004
- Messages
- 15,098
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2004
Brogden was a lefty.what971 said:Today is a great day for Australian Communism.
Another Fascist Pig of a Politician kicked out. The Revolution Comes!
Brogden was a lefty.what971 said:Today is a great day for Australian Communism.
Another Fascist Pig of a Politician kicked out. The Revolution Comes!
On current Liberal scales yes, which is all the more scarywithoutaface said:Brogden was a lefty.
townie said:hahaha, brogden's an idiot, he said all that stuff around JOURNALISTS
P.S. after only 6 beers, wat a lightweight
SashatheMan said:where did u get that he had 6 beers>?
anyway i always hated that guy, so glad he is gone
Toodulu said:he couldn't have survived this scandal without support from his party (who probably leaked the story in the first place)
For anyone who may be interested, here's the PM report that discussed the above.Soma said:It was broken by The Australian's Glen Milne who was informed of it by a senior Liberal Party member.
Libs were cheesed that Brogden was making no headway even though Carr was gone and decided to get rid of him.
I demand clarification. I realise where you're coming from, once again preferring to remain aloof from the Liberal-Labor divide, weilding your sabre of centrism with which to slay all of those who rear their partisan heads whenever they make a highly biased statement, as well as to grant yourself the personal satisfaction of not having succumbed to an allegiance to either of the two main parties. It's an admirable path, but it's a path of intellectual snobbery, a mindset that any number of us could have confined myself too had it not been for the realisation the centrist commentary, despite how nourishing it is, does not result in political progress.Generator said:*shakes head*
You'd never see someone of the Liberal party behave in such a manner. Depsite how much we dislike the ALP, we never go as far as to abuse their family or make plans to kill them, seeing as though they are more than capable of acting in such a manner themselves. The whole culture of the Labor Party disgusts me, the way everyone ingratiates themselves to the nearest high-ranking party official, lavishing them in praise in the hope of recognition and favour.
I prefer my twist (and it's just as valid, too).
leetom said:I demand clarification. I realise where you're coming from, once again preferring to remain aloof from the Liberal-Labor divide, weilding your sabre of centrism with which to slay all of those who rear their partisan heads whenever they make a highly biased statement, as well as to grant yourself the personal satisfaction of not having succumbed to an allegiance to either of the two main parties. It's an admirable path, but it's a path of intellectual snobbery, a mindset that any number of us could have confined myself too had it not been for the realisation the centrist commentary, despite how nourishing it is, does not result in political progress.
I don't condemn your politics, without them this forum would be without essential moderation, but this reply is made more out of a despair that you consider me to be in the same league of ideological confinement as the likes of anti-mathmite and comrade nathan. I am of Labor inclination, but not a partisan and not so extreme so that I refuse to acknowledge the argument put forward but those of a differing inclination.
But to return to my original post, I do believe that the Liberal Party is plagued by a kind of Old Boys Club attitude, and that it is the Party where imperfect citizens find themselves apart of because it caters to their imperfection. I think this is evident in the way a man of Brogden's demeanor is able to become leader of the state organisation of the party. His apology was pissweak and to me appeared insincere. Perhaps I'm just old-fashioned, but when you've been caught out abusing not your political enemy himself, but his wife, you stand there and repent and only repent- not combine the apology with a political attack. See, Brogden could well have joined the Labor Party if he was motivated by his circumstances, but instead he joined the Liberals because he beleived it catered to what was a dormant sense of racial superiority and an excusable contempt for the value of women.
I didn't make an effort to discuss any faults of the ALP, that's true, but that doesn't make me a party partisan. I think it can be generally acknowledged that no Labor member has ever harboured a desire to kill their opposite number, nor have they ever sunk low enough to launch derogatory verbal attacks on the family members of their opposite numbers.I support both the Democrats and the ALP, although that isn't to say that such support is blind, especially when you have the ever so wonderous factional system destroying the ALP from within. As far as I was concerned, your post was nothing more than a partisan diatribe which indicated that you were ignoring the many inadequacies of the ALP. In light of your response, I stand by my twist, although I will add that comments such as your own are just as likely to inhibit progress as those that are scathing of both parties given their many faults.