Students helping students, join us in improving Bored of Studies by donating and supporting future students!
Ah...Nope. Terry Lee only does Ext. 1 and 2
But you can find general, 2 unit, ext. 1 and 2 at itute.com.
Unlike Carrotsticks and Terry Lee, itute take their time getting solutions up. Maybe in a few weeks.
The Board of Studies will also publish solutions - but much later. Maybe even next year!
I wrote this aswell, but because S'PS is not 90 you cannot say CosB, you need to say sin <QPS (confirmed by Carrot). Hopefully they'll be nice to us and award us a mark but it's doubtful [since incorrect].Just wondering, for Question 16b, if I resolve the forces for iv and v, would I be able to get 1 mark each? For iv, I just wroteand for v, I wrote
.
Crap. I didn't realise that because I forgot that P lies on an ellipse, not a circle.I wrote this aswell, but because S'PS is not 90 you cannot say CosB, you need to say sin <QPS (confirmed by Carrot). Hopefully they'll be nice to us and award us a mark but it's doubtful [since incorrect].
What if I labelled 'alpha' on the diagram but did not say 'let QPS = alpha'?Just like you letyou had to let
![]()
Diagram in your answer booklet right? Could be ok I guess, surely they'd work it out.What if I labelled 'alpha' on the diagram but did not say 'let QPS = alpha'?
Phew! lol (yeh diagram in my answer booklet)Diagram in your answer booklet right? Could be ok I guess, surely they'd work it out.
Here are the solutions to this year's MX2 paper!
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ao9yfa5reav9gq7/HSC 2013 Solutions.pdf?m
A huge thank you to all who pointed out any computational errors!
thatd probs be 3/4 wouldnt it? carried on errors... as long as you did an ibpWill I get anything for the e^x volumes question if I did exactly what u did, BUT I replaced the 4-x with 3-x? I would think since I got so close to the answer and obviously knew what I was doing, even if I messed up 1 number, I should at least get 1/4 right?
fuck YEAAAthatd probs be 3/4 wouldnt it? carried on errors... as long as you did an ibp
O yea, also with curve sketching, I slightly messed up x intercepts of 2nd graph, but shape is identical, as well as clearly distinguishable y intercept rather than (0,0), what would I get for it? 2/3 or 3/3?How is the curve sketching marked?
Is it 3 for right graph and 0 for anything else?
>slightly messed upO yea, also with curve sketching, I slightly messed up x intercepts of 2nd graph, but shape is identical, as well as clearly distinguishable y intercept rather than (0,0), what would I get for it? 2/3 or 3/3?
Depends, how exactly did you stuff them up? If they are not between the right x coordinatess then probs one mark offO yea, also with curve sketching, I slightly messed up x intercepts of 2nd graph, but shape is identical, as well as clearly distinguishable y intercept rather than (0,0), what would I get for it? 2/3 or 3/3?
Hmm alright, i tried working it out just then for fun, and i think you have to construct another 2 lines and do some other stuff just to find CE. So saying 'similarly' should be fineConcensus is that you can, since it's a 1marker (I wrote by symmetry just in case).