Does God exist? (1 Viewer)

do you believe in god?


  • Total voters
    1,531
Joined
Dec 12, 2003
Messages
3,492
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
That may not necessaily be true :p
Well, the fact that we can't see, hear etc magnetic fields doesn't disprove their existence.

Although they may be disproved in other ways :p


/changes topic of conversation abruptly away from science.
 

Kwayera

Passive-aggressive Mod
Joined
May 10, 2004
Messages
5,959
Location
Antarctica
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
Well, the fact that we can't see, hear etc magnetic fields doesn't disprove their existence.

Although they may be disproved in other ways :p

/changes topic of conversation abruptly away from science.
No, what I meant was that we aren't necessarily unable to sense them. There's anecdotal "evidence" of people being able to sense magnetic fields, which isn't unusual in the animal kingdom (birds sense magnetic fields via magnetic-sensitive crystals in the brain, and navigate by it) and as such isn't implausible in humans, just unlikely.

But that's neither here nor there :p
 

Iron

Ecclesiastical Die-Hard
Joined
Jul 14, 2004
Messages
7,765
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Omg, there's anecdotal "evidence" of religious experiences too!
AMAZING
 

Iron

Ecclesiastical Die-Hard
Joined
Jul 14, 2004
Messages
7,765
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Yeah, so shut up.
SP's point stands
 

Cookie182

Individui Superiore
Joined
Nov 29, 2005
Messages
1,484
Location
Global
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Well he created the earth, he sustains it. Not just that he can be known, christians have a personal relationship with him
You would have no relationship, if language ceased to exist. Given its all words...

Start with this: http://www.strongatheism.net/library/atheology/introduction_to_semantic_apologetics/

Then this: http://www.strongatheism.net/library/atheology/argument_from_noncognitivism/

Then this: http://www.strongatheism.net/library/atheology/conifers_refutation_of_noncognitivism/

And if your still not convinced by the argument from semantic apologetics: http://www.strongatheism.net/library/atheology/process_based_noncognitivism/

Just some food for thought.
 

Cookie182

Individui Superiore
Joined
Nov 29, 2005
Messages
1,484
Location
Global
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
I find the Apathetic god Paradox very interesting:

If your unlimited, then you would have no needs.

"A god, by definition, has infinite metaphysical power, in that it has no limits whatsoever. It contains all actualities and potentialities within itself, and cannot experience desire or loss, or any other motivating factor.

This may require more explanation, however. How can we say that a god cannot experience any motivating factor? Because motivating factors come from limits. That which pushes us to act, or makes one action more desirable than another, is a value, a need, and therefore limits. Even exterior causes cannot push one to act unless one has a limit that is exploited by that cause.

Being all-knowing, it would have no knowledge to gain, and therefore could not feel any emotion – could never be surprised, angry, pleased, satisfied, dissatisfied, etc. To feel an emotion is an evolutionary shortcut that spurs us to action. A god, being infinite, has no need to act or to have shortcuts.

We can generalize the paradox to any level of metaphysical power. The Amoral God Paradox can be expressed like this:

I .Raising a volitional being’s metaphysical power will generally raise the scope and potentiality of its actions.
II. Raising a volitional being’s metaphysical power will generally lower its need to act, and therefore its moral scope.

Or even simpler, the higher the metaphysical power, the more powerful its moral choices are, but the least it needs or desires to make those choices.

As for how it applies specifically to the case of the god-concept, the Paradox can be used in atheology to disprove the idea that a god created anything. Without any motivation, there can be no action. This can be used in Materialist Apologetics (especially on theistic moral principles, but everything else too), the Problem of Evil and the Cosmological Argument. The Paradox can also be used as a separate argument.

The argument could be constructed like this:

1. If divine creation is true, then the universe was created by a non-limited god.
2. A god cannot have any internal motivating factor, including need, desire, ignorance, or emotion.
3. If divine creation is true, then there was no cause outside of a god before Creation.
4. If divine creation is true, then a god was not subject to exterior causes before Creation. (from 3)
5. A god before Creation cannot have any internal or exterior motivating factors. (from 2 and 4)
6. A god would never act, and divine creation cannot be true. (from 5)"

Apathetic God Paradox
 

Cookie182

Individui Superiore
Joined
Nov 29, 2005
Messages
1,484
Location
Global
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Why do people want to create a thread like this in the first place?
What's so interesting about finding out who believes in God and who doesn't?
Whether you believe in God or not is your own business so just leave it at that. It's not like someone's gonna be converted online.
The most fundamental question of all time. The underlying factor behind our "supposed" sense of morality, our laws, our politics. It needs to be rigorously debated. Next you'll be throwing out "we should just respect people's beliefs" garbage.
 

Iron

Ecclesiastical Die-Hard
Joined
Jul 14, 2004
Messages
7,765
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
The most fundamental question of all time. The underlying factor behind our "supposed" sense of morality, our laws, our politics. It needs to be rigorously debated. Next you'll be throwing out "we should just respect people's beliefs" garbage.
But surely youd agree that debating this is ultimately not very helpful, Cookie?
Well I suppose you wouldnt. We win very few people through a formal appeal to reason. This is why you seek constant debate, because you know that I cant win anyone over myself though an appeal to some iron externality, but have to appeal to them to explore their inner-most sensitive, human feelings on the matter

Curses!
 

Cookie182

Individui Superiore
Joined
Nov 29, 2005
Messages
1,484
Location
Global
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
But surely youd agree that debating this is ultimately not very helpful, Cookie?
Well I suppose you wouldnt. We win very few people through a formal appeal to reason. This is why you seek constant debate, because you know that I cant win anyone over myself though an appeal to some iron externality, but have to appeal to them to explore their inner-most sensitive, human feelings on the matter

Curses!
Oh your quite correct, no amount of good argument will sway (the problem with religion in the first place), but in saying that, this does not undermine the very need to argue.
 

Cookie182

Individui Superiore
Joined
Nov 29, 2005
Messages
1,484
Location
Global
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
On a side note, I read the New Testament yesterday. Was bored at uni and some random dude handed them out.

The utter sexism present is horrendous. The whole gospel of Timothy is a treacherous work of literature, to say the least. Then there is revelations...shudder.

Although, admittedly I didn't mind Mathew's account of the Sermon on the Mount- he writes with a consistent, if possible, enjoyable prose.

Assuming Jesus is quoted correctly, he has a very predictable oratory style:

"Assuredly, it has long been said...BUT I say to you....for what reward is that...

*chuck in a few blessed this/that...boom, you've got it down pat.

I think I might copy this style for the speech I have to do in Finance next week on the GFC

Assuredly, it has long been said that property prices always rise, BUT I say to you, this is not the case...for if you only invest in property, what reward is there in that?

There are some undertones of violence as well- however at times I'd have to say, the NT as a whole kind of drones on/severe repetition. I think for readability, the Koran is much more fun. The NT reads with the pace of a film like the "Godfather", the Koran is fuckin "Die Hard" With a Vengeance".

Edit: Then there's the OT...nothing short of "A Clockwork Orange"
 
Last edited:

Iron

Ecclesiastical Die-Hard
Joined
Jul 14, 2004
Messages
7,765
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
The universe was created at the big bang and there is no god.
One doesnt follow the other, my fren. You cant read it literally.

And lol cookie, but that was cheap coming from you
 

Cookie182

Individui Superiore
Joined
Nov 29, 2005
Messages
1,484
Location
Global
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
But seriously, to the true Christian, the NT is not bad, but I think JK Rowling writes better...

But like, what is so impressive about it? Surely it doesn't stand with the classic works of literature- I find "A Brave New World" much more inspiring. Yea I disected out the message of love etc

But tbh I'm rather disappointed. I thought all this argument, the one book people die with it by bedside, the book given out in prisons, hospitals etc

What am I missing here ppl...what's the conclusion?

In fact, what's the problem/conflict in the first place?
 

Riet

Tomcat Pilot
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
3,622
Location
Miramar, CA
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
One doesnt follow the other, my fren. You cant read it literally.

And lol cookie, but that was cheap coming from you
There is no reason to believe a god has ever been involved in the development of the universe.
 

Cookie182

Individui Superiore
Joined
Nov 29, 2005
Messages
1,484
Location
Global
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
One doesnt follow the other, my fren. You cant read it literally.

And lol cookie, but that was cheap coming from you
Cheap, yes, but I'm in a very stiring mood.

Ok, turning seriousness on...

I am actually astounded though that people are that inspired by this book. I'm concurrently reading the Quran, it's far more passionate and tenacious.

Like we get into some hefty debate here, philosophically etc

But after reading it, I'm kind of shocked at the lack of any real philosophical depth. No important questions of morality are answered or justified. The meaning of life is avoided, not tackled. Even Jesus shows signs of contradictory behaviour and if not all else, weakness at times. I see something far less then the "perfection" proclaimed. I feel like a critic coming down hard on one of those built up films, which collapsed halfway. Sorry, but all thats offered is a primitive vision of love that is quickly diluted by contradictions and bigotry. What is so special, really?

The classical Greeks offer me much more inquiry...if your after meaningful contemplation, get some Plato or Socrates in you.

I find more love in a Disney classic or a Jane Austin novel...just saying.
 
Last edited:

Iron

Ecclesiastical Die-Hard
Joined
Jul 14, 2004
Messages
7,765
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
There is no reason to believe a god has ever been involved in the development of the universe.
But then, where would the fun be if there was? Youre referring to something that can satisfy men's intelligence in a material way. Faith is not this thing.
 

SylviaB

Just Bee Yourself 🐝
Joined
Nov 26, 2008
Messages
6,867
Location
Lidcombe
Gender
Female
HSC
2021
But then, where would the fun be if there was? Youre referring to something that can satisfy men's intelligence in a material way. Faith is not this thing.

Yeah hey bro, it's funny how god acts as thought he doesn't exist.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top