Titburger
Member
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2009
- Messages
- 168
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2009
It's freakin hugeAnd hence God must have a wang.
It's freakin hugeAnd hence God must have a wang.
Interesting choice of words.I can't say for certain that he does or doesn't exist. If some rock hard evidence came out for a side, then it'd be easier.
If there is a god - who created him?
If there isn't - who created the world?
There are some things that we'll never know.
What foul word jumbles leak from that jumbled jejune mind of yours. 'Science' does not 'prove' any theory, it may only support (i.e corroborate) or disqualify a theory. However this 'god' notion of yours doesn't even qualify as a bad theory, nor weak hypothesis, it is simply a lazy thoughthole dug by mental serfs. It falls below such inquiry as astrology in terms of the worth knowing. Keep digging, boy.You cannot disprove that God exists the same time you could prove it.
And no, science cannot either disprove or prove that God exists, so stuff it with the null hypothesis and probability.
**Just a thought. Grace. Perhaps you've heard of it? It's not the question of who created the universe and everything in it, it is about the fact that you are simply alive, even existing as another anonymity in the Internet, just because someone out there is enabling you to do so. God only knows why you aren't being sold to another person halfway around the world for a mere $10, why you haven't been born autistic, missing a leg or a heart, why you haven't died because some uncaring person decided not to heed road rules. You don't deserve what half of you were given, if you realise what 3/4 of the world live without. My conviction is that, if there is no God, no Big-guy-in-the-sky, and this world existed as is, where would you be?**
Impossible to say, Religion influenced quite a long period of time which limited the possibilities for Humanity. Anything, quite literally, could have happened to Humanity if God was never involved. Imagine if the world was discovered to be a globe much earlier, Science develops faster. Interesting possibilities.**Just a thought. Grace. Perhaps you've heard of it? It's not the question of who created the universe and everything in it, it is about the fact that you are simply alive, even existing as another anonymity in the Internet, just because someone out there is enabling you to do so. God only knows why you aren't being sold to another person halfway around the world for a mere $10, why you haven't been born autistic, missing a leg or a heart, why you haven't died because some uncaring person decided not to heed road rules. You don't deserve what half of you were given, if you realise what 3/4 of the world live without. My conviction is that, if there is no God, no Big-guy-in-the-sky, and this world existed as is, where would you be?**
i believe god does exist
I say that everything has a creator which includes us
yeah true, we probably haven't seen God in our time, but that doesn't mean he doesn't exist.
i respect people that are atheist, hek, i even have friends that are atheist. but im assuming this thread requires ones own thoughts towards the question so heres mine
hope no one got offended
If anyone can prove that there is no God and that we should all become atheists, then ill be happy to listen to the evidence
Personal necessity does not imply fact/truth.All plausible arguments MoonlightSonata but I think its important to acknowledge that God does not necessarily have to be an actual celestial being or presence, but rather can represent an initiative which stems from either the individual's personal need for validation (i.e. justifying human existence) or moral convenience (i.e. a means in which one is not bound by the responsibility of goodness of burdened by the guilt of wrongdoing but ambiguously transcends moral rigidity and acts according to their interpretation of reality).
That's what I was trying to say, albeit in a convoluted manner.Personal necessity does not imply fact/truth.
Had you a small amount of information on the big bang theory, you would realise it's occurrence was firstly a highly improbable event. The initial occurrence and it's improbability is what makes our existence so precious and it would be ignorant to consider a second occurrence in such a relatively small time frame.does exist.
universe was created through a big bang right? ok. non-believers in god will hence say that the big bang simply came out of nothing. now, theres something wrong with this. if the big bang...came out of NOTHING...why doesnt a big bang happen right now? or in the next minute. why has there only been ONE BIG BANG in the gazillion years that have gone past?
a god created that one big bang, and everything else that came with it.
amen. i love my god.
there is actually a theory called the oscilation theory that states that the universe all ends up in black holes whick slowly pull themselves together, when they are all one, the singularity changes nature as it reaches a critical mass then explodes...process repeats itself indefinitly, i'm quite surprised the atheists haven't really picked up on this and hammered it into us, it states that the universe creating itself has a probability of 1 everytime, garanteed universe equals no need for god....Had you a small amount of information on the big bang theory, you would realise it's occurrence was firstly a highly improbable event. The initial occurrence and it's improbability is what makes our existence so precious and it would be ignorant to consider a second occurrence in such a relatively small time frame.
You can attempt to reduce both the God and the atheist theory to the finest details. But, given the choice of an irreducible supernatural being who initial being has no theory, or the irreducible big bang theory, all stable minded men would know which was the more probable.
oh really? i didnt know that.Had you a small amount of information on the big bang theory, you would realise it's occurrence was firstly a highly improbable event. The initial occurrence and it's improbability is what makes our existence so precious and it would be ignorant to consider a second occurrence in such a relatively small time frame.
You can attempt to reduce both the God and the atheist theory to the finest details. But, given the choice of an irreducible supernatural being who initial being has no theory, or the irreducible big bang theory, all stable minded men would know which was the more probable.
Sounds interesting.I think i'll start a thread on that exact topic, the accelerating universe bit
are you guys telling me that you would listen to this guy
instead of this guy