• Want to help us with this year's BoS Trials?
    Let us know before 30 June. See this thread for details
  • Looking for HSC notes and resources?
    Check out our Notes & Resources page

HSC 2013 MX2 Marathon (archive) (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.

RealiseNothing

what is that?It is Cowpea
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
4,591
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

Could you clarify what you mean by , there is no term in the sum beyond , so I was wondering if it were perhaps something like
Basically it's just a relation to account for the on the end of the summation, i.e. let so you obtain
 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

Hopefully this works:











Now,





That product in the middle, we split it up individually, we are left with number of terms. Therefore by the AM-GM inequality again.



The LHS = n, therefore:



And by, (*)



And due to our initial condition



Proof is complete?
 

RealiseNothing

what is that?It is Cowpea
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
4,591
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

I'm not sure if you can assume since we have different powers for each term.
 

RealiseNothing

what is that?It is Cowpea
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
4,591
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

What do you mean?
As in, if you assume the sequence is increasing, is there really no loss of generality?

I'm pretty sure it loses generality. It only really works when all terms are essentially arbitrary with respect to eachother (for example if you could replace with and it wouldn't change anything). However since the k-th term depends on whatever term is in the numerator (as the k-th term would be the k-th root), then we can not just replace terms with each other as this would change the actual summation.

You assumed that the sequence was increasing. Now suppose otherwise and the sequence is decreasing, we get:





And this would lead to your last step, where you use the initial condition, becoming invalid. This is because it is definitely possible to have a decreasing sequence.
 
Last edited:

RealiseNothing

what is that?It is Cowpea
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
4,591
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

Two nice questions:

1) The number ends in a sequence of zeroes. Find in terms of if

(i.e. if the number was 5000, then n=3 as it ends with 3 zeroes)

2) Consider the product/number

Find the last digit of this number (i.e. the units digit).
 
Last edited:

RealiseNothing

what is that?It is Cowpea
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
4,591
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

Consider an arbitrary chord in a circle.

Let the midpoint of this chord be the point P.

Prove whether or not we can construct another chord in the same circle such that it's midpoint coincides with P.
 

braintic

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
2,137
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

Consider an arbitrary chord in a circle.

Let the midpoint of this chord be the point P.

Prove whether or not we can construct another chord in the same circle such that it's midpoint coincides with P.
Doesn't this depend on whether the arbitrary chord is in fact a diameter?
 

Drongoski

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Messages
4,252
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

I think this is equivalent to showing that this chord, with P as its mid-point, is the shortest chord passing thru P.


Edit: It is sufficient to show any chord thru P has a length different from that of this chord.
 
Last edited:

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

As in, if you assume the sequence is increasing, is there really no loss of generality?

I'm pretty sure it loses generality. It only really works when all terms are essentially arbitrary with respect to eachother (for example if you could replace with and it wouldn't change anything). However since the k-th term depends on whatever term is in the numerator (as the k-th term would be the k-th root), then we can not just replace terms with each other as this would change the actual summation.

You assumed that the sequence was increasing. Now suppose otherwise and the sequence is decreasing, we get:





And this would lead to your last step, where you use the initial condition, becoming invalid. This is because it is definitely possible to have a decreasing sequence.
Hmm I see.....

In case of montone decreasing however, we simply need to see that:



Which would make a process identical to the montone increasing one

Though for non-monotonic sequences, I think we would need to:



Whether this is true or not I don't know, but if we can prove that then we have proven it for the general case of any sequence.

I'll see if I can think of another way though
 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

Two nice questions:

1) The number ends in a sequence of zeroes. Find in terms of if

(i.e. if the number was 5000, then n=3 as it ends with 3 zeroes)

2) Consider the product/number

Find the last digit of this number (i.e. the units digit).












 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

Consider an arbitrary chord in a circle.

Let the midpoint of this chord be the point P.

Prove whether or not we can construct another chord in the same circle such that it's midpoint coincides with P.






























 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

Two nice questions:

1) The number ends in a sequence of zeroes. Find in terms of if

(i.e. if the number was 5000, then n=3 as it ends with 3 zeroes)

2) Consider the product/number

Find the last digit of this number (i.e. the units digit).
I hope this is rigorous enough:





Hence our product is:



The last digit in this product is the last digit of the number obtained by multiplying all the units terms.

Therefore the last digit of the product is the last digit of





So now we find the last digits of each of these terms, and multiply them together.

We first notice that:

3^1 = 3

3^2 = 9

3^3 = 2 7

3^4 = 8 1

3^5 = ....3

And so on, we see that the last digit is periodic every 4 powers, alternating through 3,7,9,1. We can prove this if necessary through modular arithmetic

Meaning, we simply need to determine whether the number 10^{n-1} is in the form:

4k + 1, 4k+2 , 4k+3, 4k+4.
It cannot be 4k+1, 4k+3 since it is even, and since 10^{n-1} = 2^{n-1} 5^{n-1}, if n > 2 then it is divisible by 4, hence in the form 4k+4, thus the last digit is 1 if n > 2

Similarly we do the same for 7 and 9, and notice that 7 is periodic by 4 through:

7,9,3,1

Thus for n > 2, 7^{10^{n-1}} has last digit of 1.

For 9, it is periodic of 2 through, 9,1.

If 10^{n-1} is even, last digit is 1, thus it is 1.

---

Now if n=2, then the power of 3^(10^{n-1}} is in the form 4k+2, meaning the last digit is 9
Similar for 7, last digit is 9, m,ultiply together to get 81, times 1 from the 9, thus we take last digit from that which is 1.

Therefore we see as our final answer:



I hope that's right lol
 
Last edited:

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

Strong quintuple post:



 

RealiseNothing

what is that?It is Cowpea
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
4,591
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

I hope this is rigorous enough:





Hence our product is:



The last digit in this product is the last digit of the number obtained by multiplying all the units terms.

Therefore the last digit of the product is the last digit of





So now we find the last digits of each of these terms, and multiply them together.

We first notice that:

3^1 = 3

3^2 = 9

3^3 = 2 7

3^4 = 8 1

3^5 = ....3

And so on, we see that the last digit is periodic every 4 powers, alternating through 3,7,9,1. We can prove this if necessary through modular arithmetic

Meaning, we simply need to determine whether the number 10^{n-1} is in the form:

4k + 1, 4k+2 , 4k+3, 4k+4.
It cannot be 4k+1, 4k+3 since it is even, and since 10^{n-1} = 2^{n-1} 5^{n-1}, if n > 2 then it is divisible by 4, hence in the form 4k+4, thus the last digit is 1 if n > 2

Similarly we do the same for 7 and 9, and notice that 7 is periodic by 4 through:

7,9,3,1

Thus for n > 2, 7^{10^{n-1}} has last digit of 1.

For 9, it is periodic of 2 through, 9,1.

If 10^{n-1} is even, last digit is 1, thus it is 1.

---

Now if n=2, then the power of 3^(10^{n-1}} is in the form 4k+2, meaning the last digit is 9
Similar for 7, last digit is 9, m,ultiply together to get 81, times 1 from the 9, thus we take last digit from that which is 1.

Therefore we see as our final answer:



I hope that's right lol
Yep that's right, though it's easier to do this instead:



So we only need to find the last digit of the powers of 9.
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2010
Messages
2,225
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2012
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

Love this post HSC loving you two have of this thread.
 

Ikki

Active Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2012
Messages
130
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon

Is series a topic in 4u?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top