matt#1
...
i'm a bulldogs supporter. my most hated teams are;
1. Roosters
2. Dragons
3. Brisbane
4. Warriors
5. Sharks
1. Roosters
2. Dragons
3. Brisbane
4. Warriors
5. Sharks
The Sharks! No one hates the sharks! They're the most benign team in the competition! What did they ever do to you? It's because they're from the shire innit?matt#1 said:i'm a bulldogs supporter. my most hated teams are;
1. Roosters
2. Dragons
3. Brisbane
4. Warriors
5. Sharks
yes, go the eels. but the broncos are better by far!suger_plum said:everyone hates the bulldogs, because they are so easy to hate. every sport needs a scapegoat. and theyre it. mainly becasue of the rape thing. however
GO THE EELS! IT IS OUR TIME TO SHINE
I agree. They seriously should not have been let back in the comp. They suck at footy and have stuffed the comp up with 15 teams meaning the byes had to be brought back in. Stupid bunnies!!!HotShot said:rabbitohs --wannabes should be kicked out of the comp
Those cops showed they're corrupt, thats why the PIC is investigating them.aaaman said:but did you see the police report and it findings, it stated there that it had prove of the gulity but they couldnt prove it beyond reasonable doubt. if u saw the medical report(which got leaked but not tho media), it had the physical signs of the rape but NOT of the seeman bcoz it happened in the pool. However, if they are so "innocent" then y is the rape vicitim actually getting a cash settlement out of court, if they were innocent then they would off fought it off.
the broncos SUCK. they are my hated team!Riddles said:yes, go the eels. but the broncos are better by far!
now that's something we disagree onsuger_plum said:the broncos SUCK. they are my hated team!
No, they shouldn't have been kicked out of the competition in the first place. The corporatisation of the superleague war royally screwed the game for a long time and it has only recently managed to recover.yenta said:I agree. They seriously should not have been let back in the comp. They suck at footy and have stuffed the comp up with 15 teams meaning the byes had to be brought back in. Stupid bunnies!!!
Blame the NRLcayte said:No, they shouldn't have been kicked out of the competition in the first place. The corporatisation of the superleague war royally screwed the game for a long time and it has only recently managed to recover.
Souths had to start from scratch rebuilding their squad and they finally have enough financial backing to look like they're going to be able to field a decent team next season.
I believe Souths' reinstatement should not have been at the expense of the bears, who no longer exist and went quietly with the dissolution of the manly merger. THAT is criminal. What's worse is the proposition of the Gold Coast team, funded by the NRL, whilst norths RIP. Bullshit.
Fully agree there...north sydney should become the 16th team not gold coast. I also don't understand why they are bringing it back to a 16 team comp, when the whole reason they kicked souths out in the first place was because they wanted a 14 TEAM COMP. So much for that plan, only lasted for a season or two while souths were trying to get back in. It all seems a bit ridiculous in the endcayte said:I believe Souths' reinstatement should not have been at the expense of the bears, who no longer exist and went quietly with the dissolution of the manly merger. THAT is criminal. What's worse is the proposition of the Gold Coast team, funded by the NRL, whilst norths RIP. Bullshit.
didnt the bears merge with manly, but then something went wrong during the merge and the bears lost their name?yenta said:Fully agree there...north sydney should become the 16th team not gold coast. I also don't understand why they are bringing it back to a 16 team comp, when the whole reason they kicked souths out in the first place was because they wanted a 14 TEAM COMP. So much for that plan, only lasted for a season or two while souths were trying to get back in. It all seems a bit ridiculous in the end
im suree if we got talking we would disagree on alot of thingsRiddles said:now that's something we disagree on
The manly-norths merger was always destined to fail becase the two clubs were arch rivals management hated each other. Manly had the money, norths went broke, norths disappeared. It's got to do with plenty more than names.shortygb said:didnt the bears merge with manly, but then something went wrong during the merge and the bears lost their name?
magpies (wests) merged with tigers so noe they are Wests Tigers, so sorta i guess?are magpies a nrl team?...if so what are they called?