Kiraken
RISK EVERYTHING
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2012
- Messages
- 1,908
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- HSC
- N/A
yes that is what he claimed though, now ur just talking BS hahagoogle searching 'pew research muslim' and you get results straight away. It's not some obscure paper that nobody can find.
It shows that most don't support (or rather, admit to supporting) violent terrorism itself, but he didn't claim that they do. Nor is such support necessary to be considered an extremist.
Who's the liar now? He didn't say supporting Palestine, he said supporting hamas.
Which DOES make you an extremist.
If a christian proposed biblical rule of a western country they would absolutely be called an christian fundamentalist or extremist every day of the week
Sharia law as practiced in muslim countries means islamic rules enforced on everybody else and an opposition to religious freedom
Yes, it absolutely makes you an extremist.
>Accuses people of having a lack of sources
> plain just makes assertions
that's the entire point of his video, to show that muslims sympathise with terrorists even though that very paper he quotes includes data showing the opposite
many people support Hamas due to it's role in Palestine rather than any sort of religious affiliation which is the point im making, for many people support of Hamas is pretty much synonymous with supporting Palestine, there *is* a reason Hamas isn't actually designated as a terror organisation by many countries and international organisations, many of whom are not muslim-dominated either.
And no actually, that isn't the case at all. The Qur'an actually allows for religious freedom (there is literally a quote in it saying "there should be no compulsion to religion"), just because it is applied in an extremist manner in certain countries (all of which have a measure of political corruption btw) it doesn't mean it is a 100% legitimate form of Sharia or equivalent to the understanding of Sharia the majority of other Muslims have.