denise_ said:
i think pre-uni is totally lacking in credibility. They rung my house last night doing a "survey" asking whether or not my brother had made it into the selective schools. My brother has not even been to one of their lessons. The only reason they knew our details was that we registered him to one of their "trial" selective exams. However, he didn't end up going because he apparently had a stomach ache. anywho, beyond the point. And yes, he did get selected to attend a selective school in 2007.
I can't believe they were going to use him to advertise for their centres. Unprofessional practices.
I think you are somewhat confused as to how a tutoring college actually works.
1. Most colleges want their students to succeed and will endeavour to help them do so. One such way of determining whether or not the service you are offering is helpful is to determine how many people 'pass their exam' or 'receive a certain score' or meet some other criteria. The effectiveness of this method is arguable under different circumstances but at the very least, such data DOES give some indication of the value of the service provided. So, in terms of improving the service offered, it is necessary to find out how the student performs.
2. Tutoring colleges are businesses. There are very few colleges open that are currently operating on a loss. To maintain a business, you need revenue. Generally speaking, revenue is proportional to advertising. To advertise, those marks or data that you collected are somewhat important. Potential customers want to know how your past students performed. They don't want to enrol their child if 0 out of 50 kids didn't make it into the selective school. Having that data is advantageous both to the business and to future customers. (I'm not going into a discussion about whether or not the mark could be obtained by the student without the college - obviously this is true in some cases, untrue in other cases - it's not terribly measurable).
So keeping those two points in mind, it makes perfect logical sense, for this business, with whom your brother enrolled into a course with, to phone you up and ask you for your details.
The fact that you happen to be a rare case in which the student did not actually sit one of the exams (because he didn't turn up) is NOT likely to be stored on their computer system - particularly if you either: (i) didn't pay for the service, (ii) disenrolled and never attended again [It was hard to tell which context was more appropriate from your post].
In conclusion, I feel that your argument is spurious. You cannot draw the conclusion that you have from the facts you have stated. In other words, Pre-Uni may, or may not, be lacking in credibility, but your post does not lend support to
either theory.
For anyone that bothered to read that, sorry for wall of text.
I just couldn't help but comment. ;d