Not-That-Bright
Andrew Quah
However i believe somewhere there it also showed that 86% of all abortions are for social reasons such as ( i don't wan't it), not because of rape or endangerment of health....
I do think there should be a general limit, however there are two main problems with this:Not-That-Bright said:that's where i got my information from about abortion limits and such girlanachronism,
don't you think there should be a limit tho... like i think 12 weeks should be the limit...
The reason why yours probably didn't seem to have as much blood is because you got to your fairly early, u said 5-6 weeks didn't you? however by around 12-14 weeks the baby can feel pain...
That video i believe was a baby of 12-14 weeks... something along those lines.
btw, i'm referring to your entire contribution to this thread with the following:superbird said:WTF. Those foetuses WERE aborted!
i wont bother to explain how stupid this statement is. The pictures show the end result of abortions and are not merely pictures of foetuses.ummmm...those were pictures of foetuses, not pictures of abortions. you do understand the difference, right?
we have yet to see you argue anything validthat, and the fact you can't argue any valid points
You obviously live in a fantasy world if you think doctors are perfect and NEVER misdiagnose disease, which you are clearly mistaken.coz doctors never misdiagnose diseases, especially with fetuses in the womb which are so easy to examine
Sure it has a heart beat, doesnt mean its alive right . You obviously think that a person is alive only when they are breathing. What happens if they go into a temporarty coma or drowned but can be revived. Would you pronounce them dead cause they cannot breathe?you know that having a beating heart does not mean you have working lungs, right? the lungs develop late as, you know, they are kinda useless inside a womb
I'm not sure a foetus does breathe, nor do I think its heart beats.crazyhomo said:omg, you really are an idiot. seriously, you are just digging yourself deeper.
1) you are trying to say that a foetus is the same thing as an abortion. how do you even know those pictures were from aborted foetuses? for all you know they were miscarriages
2) i love irony. especially how in order to 'prove' i have no valid points you had to ignore the majority of my posts and go back 10 pages
3) maybe you should look up this. if you are uncertain when to apply it, try using this
4) once again, i think you should learn how to use context. if you were able to perform this simple task that most us common folk take for granted, then you could see how your response makes no sense.
firstly, i did not say a person needs to breathe in order to be considered alive. the post i quoted stated that since a foetus had a heart, then it must also have lungs, and i was pointing out the flaw in this logic
secondly, 'let's not get into the ethical and moral side of this statement'? ummm....isn't that the whole point of this thread? to argue at what point a foetus becomes human? or maybe i'm living in a fantasy world and have misunderstood
hahaha you're a gronk. like seriously, i agree with pat, learn how to apply context to a certain situation.Sure it has a heart beat, doesnt mean its alive right . You obviously think that a person is alive only when they are breathing. What happens if they go into a temporarty coma or drowned but can be revived. Would you pronounce them dead cause they cannot breathe?
You inadvertely implied that a baby is useless in a womb because it has no proper organs?? Lets not get into the ethical and moral side of this statement. You probably dont have any respect for human life.
wrongnor do I think its heart beats.