stalk_if_u_dare
cheese hater
I dont see SCIENCE FICTION on this list!
Go Dr Who!
Go Dr Who!
reminds of George Castanza in an epsiode of Seinfeld. The audio tape unfortunately had a voice similar to his, which is what he was trying to escape in the first place. Very funny.Korn said:They should make audio tapes of every book written, im not much a fan of reading, cause its alot of work, ild prefer audio tapes
Ive been reading these posts and I cant see how you reach the conclusion that your winning. Much of your criticism is your interpretation, for example your trouble with Helms deep, and your dislike of using appendixes, rather than an overall view of Tolkien's works. The use of dividing the story in two, which results in two plots, in the second and third books is viewed by many as extremely effective compared to changing between chapters which can result in a rather superficial reading. As a neutral observer I must say that 'The United Peoples of Middle Earth' are winning.Argonaut said:That's a little more like it. Since you're something of a LotR fan, I thought you might be ready to charge into our debate about what makes the genre good. So far it's mostly been the United Peoples of Middle Earth and the Confederation of RandLand slugging it out. We're winning.
You're only using one particular instance from that debate, though. Look at some more of Argo's, kami's, PwarYuex's and even a couple of my posts, and you can see a more balanced argument for why LOTR might not necessarily be the best.fish fingers said:Ive been reading these posts and I cant see how you reach the conclusion that your winning. Much of your criticism is your interpretation, for example your trouble with Helms deep, and your dislike of using appendixes, rather than an overall view of Tolkien's works. The use of dividing the story in two, which results in two plots, in the second and third books is viewed by many as extremely effective compared to changing between chapters which can result in a rather superficial reading. As a neutral observer I must say that 'The United Peoples of Middle Earth' are winning.
i completely agree. i'm sure someone's said this before, but *shrugs* how are u going to judge the greatest book ever written? what criteria would u use? the fact that ppl still read it despite it having been around for millennia? or that the author was considered the "father" of the genre? perhaps because the author is immensely popular today and has more than 10 books released? or because they have sold a lot of books overall? maybe because it has an enjoyable plot? or (heaven forbid) a completely original story? likeable/not so likeable characters? the "skill" of the author? not to mention that personal preferences also come into play. i could go on and on, but i have to go soon.jhakka said:I don't know if it is the best or not. However I strongly disagree with the whole idea of equating first with best.