Re: Fairfield Troung's recommendation - English
In year 12, you are expressly told that the marking schemes at Sefton are ridiculously harsh, but only to allow you to benefit in the grand schemes of things when HSC moderation plays into your favour. Also, we're also told to put effort into perfecting our essays that can be easily moulded to suit most questions, and in my experience this works best; even the most brilliant of minds will not, unless they are given a burst of inspiration, find forty minutes insufficient.
Last year, we received 13 band 6's in advanced English, which is a marked improvement from previous year.s 13 out of roughly 65 students in advanced means that we're roughly getting one in five kids in that particular course scoring band six. As for standard, I do agree that more of them should be able to do advanced, because we don't get band sixes in standard and invariably, our ranks drop. For the most part, I tend not to emphasise ranks because ranks are only based on how many band sixes were scored out of the number of students attempting a course. In many cases, as with the strength of our standard English results, this does not seem to be a fair indication, as many students will rank within the top 1% of the state in that course.
All in all, I don't think our English department is all that bad. If we're being completely honest, there are some other facets of our school that could be improved, such as our chemistry course. I do recall us getting only one band six in chemistry in 2006, yet our science faculty often escapes any excessively harsh criticism. I think for English, our students just need to approach it with more of a positive attitude.
I'm not denying the fact that Sefton's English department is perfect. Far from it, actually, and I do tend to agree that Sefton's English marking criteria are usually harsh and, in some cases, unfair. However, I don't think there can be any doubt that most kids in Sefton will ultimately gravitate towards the maths and the sciences (which, if we're being completely honest, isn't that good, and probably isn't even as good as English if we're talking about chemistry). I can't find a single reason why this would be... perhaps English is not as attractive, true, but this is our HSC's we're talking about - if you want to succeed, you need to put in the work.Trebla said:I choose to believe otherwise. The people who actually do put the effort in and do the work still don't get good scores. I knew people who love and are really good at English/Arts, and somehow they still don't manage a band 6 or even close to it? Even the top students (those who usually love English and work hard in it) tend to get low band 6 in Advanced, few have ever scored any better than that. Some students who migrated to other schools, and were relatively low ranked (average) at Sefton before they left, ended up with final HSC marks in English which corresponded to about top 10 at Sefton.
I mean from my own experience, there were heaps of people who entered in Year 7 who loved English over Maths. By Year 12, many became converted to liking Maths over English. Surely there must be some cause of this "maths/science" culture. Perhaps the teachers don't make English as interesting as it should be? It may also be thanks to their ridiculously pedantic marking schemes which screws everyone's confidence in English and cause many to just "give up". Perhaps the Maths faculty are better at making their own subject area more attractive?
I'm not saying that all the teachers in the English faculty are completely responsible for the results. However, I do believe they have some contribution to the school's poor results to certain extent (though they may have you believe otherwise).
That being said, Ms Diab is probably the standout best of the entire English faculty. According to the experience of others, they often said that they learn more from Ms Diab in one period than all the periods taught by Levick, Repin or Pothoven put together.
In year 12, you are expressly told that the marking schemes at Sefton are ridiculously harsh, but only to allow you to benefit in the grand schemes of things when HSC moderation plays into your favour. Also, we're also told to put effort into perfecting our essays that can be easily moulded to suit most questions, and in my experience this works best; even the most brilliant of minds will not, unless they are given a burst of inspiration, find forty minutes insufficient.
Last year, we received 13 band 6's in advanced English, which is a marked improvement from previous year.s 13 out of roughly 65 students in advanced means that we're roughly getting one in five kids in that particular course scoring band six. As for standard, I do agree that more of them should be able to do advanced, because we don't get band sixes in standard and invariably, our ranks drop. For the most part, I tend not to emphasise ranks because ranks are only based on how many band sixes were scored out of the number of students attempting a course. In many cases, as with the strength of our standard English results, this does not seem to be a fair indication, as many students will rank within the top 1% of the state in that course.
All in all, I don't think our English department is all that bad. If we're being completely honest, there are some other facets of our school that could be improved, such as our chemistry course. I do recall us getting only one band six in chemistry in 2006, yet our science faculty often escapes any excessively harsh criticism. I think for English, our students just need to approach it with more of a positive attitude.