Better hope soIs she gonna beat your atar
Better hope soIs she gonna beat your atar
Bet send itFUDGE I just made an error w a question nearly exact to one i did earlier, someone pls kmp
no not masaken 2.0 she's doing completely diff subjects to me (think 3u eng + 2u math + legal business society bio all those humanitiesMasaken 2.0
as she shouldno not masaken 2.0 she's doing completely diff subjects to me (think 3u eng + 2u math + legal business society all those humanities )
if she needs a tutor for business for whatever reason i'll direct her to you <3as she should
100 2u incno not masaken 2.0 she's doing completely diff subjects to me (think 3u eng + 2u math + legal business society bio all those humanitiesshe's not even doing history)
frick that qn it was a careless error, if ur gonna help , help me w b) ii here. I was able to take out the inverse pre easily, but they somehow found dy/dx before even finding the inverse? I tried taking the inv c(x) to the lhs but even taking implicit diff I came back to the same friggin eqBet send it
Is that sinh and coshfrick that qn it was a careless error, if ur gonna help , help me w b) ii here. I was able to take out the inverse pre easily, but they somehow found dy/dx before even finding the inverse? I tried taking the inv c(x) to the lhs but even taking implicit diff I came back to the same friggin eq
View attachment 41837
never learnt that so i wouldnt know lmao. I dont think thats neccessary bc iv and v are pretty stock standard aft u find the inverse functionIs that sinh and cosh
OH ur thinking 4u, nah dude this a 3u paper- r we allowed to use 4u methods for 3u tests or ?Is that sinh and cosh
depends on your teachers cos i remember for a 3u paper for internals involving solving area under inverse trig curves the kids who did integration by parts ended up getting marks i think but other schools may not because it wouldn't be fair or smthr we allowed to use 4u methods for 3u tests or ?
ur momdepends on your teachers cos i remember for a 3u paper for internals involving solving area under inverse trig curves the kids who did integration by parts ended up getting marks i think but other schools may not because it wouldn't be fair or smth
if you mess up you won't get as many (if any) marks for workingOH ur thinking 4u, nah dude this a 3u paper- r we allowed to use 4u methods for 3u tests or ?
it's not in 4u i just saw the formulae and thought they were sinh and coshOH ur thinking 4u, nah dude this a 3u paper- r we allowed to use 4u methods for 3u tests or ?
it's fairly difficult but not impossibleHey, everyone .
I‘m scared for maths ext 1 next year. If anyone has completed prelim, is it hard ?
FYI, I was in 5.3 maths this year but I failed two of the assessments and barely scraped by in passing the course overall. (I ended up with B7 on my RoSA, which I’m pretty sure is kinda bad if you’re in 5.3).
I tried really hard in my study towards the assessments but during assessments my mind shuts off and I forget EVERYTHING istg.
Does anyone have any tips on how to combat test anxiety, along with addressing careless errors.
Sidenote, I am aiming for a 99+ ATAR and getting into med school to become a GP (I know it’s very ambitious and very unachievable) along with getting all - rounder in HSC. I am willing to put the work into achieving this. My family is not in the financial position to afford tutoring so I will need to work hard.
In summary, is it possible to have an ‘academic glow-up’ such that I achieve a 99+ ATAR, or am I just delusional and in denial and what should I do over the holidays to prepare?
I wish everyone the best of luck and pray for your successes going into prelims next year!
P.s - Sorry for my very unorganised writing (my brain ain’t functioning after my traumatic y10 yearlies
P.s 2 - I’m planning on taking 4u.
why do you want to find the inverse?frick that qn it was a careless error, if ur gonna help , help me w b) ii here. I was able to take out the inverse pre easily, but they somehow found dy/dx before even finding the inverse? I tried taking the inv c(x) to the lhs but even taking implicit diff I came back to the same friggin eq
View attachment 41837