Search results

Thanks fizzy :) Cleared up a lot for me

Simple fix: Limit at 1000 words and students have a fixed time to compose such a response.

Yeah i got the names jumbled sorry! Anyway, I don't think Einstein explained Planck's hypothesis? He only expanded on it which then explained photoelectric effect

Hi have some gaps in my understanding: Dotpoint "Identify Einstein’s contribution to quantum theory and its relation to black body radiation" Einstein's contribution to quantum theory -> Proposed that light is quantised (is it wrong to say this since Planck proposed it? Should I instead say...

Thanks. My essays were actually around 900 words but I put 800 for the sake of comparing quantity vs quality

Yeah but that just screams out regurgitation. As I said, they didn't answer the question.

Reflecting on my English trials, I omitted some paragraphs in my prepared essays because they didn't or couldn't answer the question, resulting in my essay being about 800 words (for both mod B and mod C). Should I have just included the omitted paragraphs do I don't get marked down for "shallow...

What was the hardest/longest q?

ya we have to actually have to learn english sadlyf

I'm definitely going to be switching up my game plan for HSC English though... will be memorising paragraphs of key points instead of a whole essay. And then write the conclusion on the day. Too much emotional struggle to memorise 5k words for me lol allnightered yesterday

fun times memorising 5k words

I've been reading some exemplar responses and noticed that not many people include critical interpretations in their essay response. Why is this? Part of the rubric says to critically consider the perspectives of others and I thought it'd be smart to explore these perspectives in your essays...

I thought the absolute value always gives the acute angle and so it doesn't matter which is m1 and m2 :S

but he ask very nicely and most gratefully :'((

You mislinked both of them :P

bump

strong contradiction

Why is inside a space shuttle in orbit an inertial frame of reference (I'm assuming they are since occupants don't experience an acceleration)? Isn't it continuously accelerating (due to orbit)? I lack understanding in what defines an inertial frame

How do you explain the Meissner effect? I believe it is wrong to explain the Meissner effect as the induction of currents which perfectly oppose the relative motion of the magnet (Lenz's Law) thereby excluding any magnetic flux within the superconductor in superconducting state. This is wrong...

Thanks :)