bitchgirl
University Life
is that all you got? about my sigwithoutaface said:Are those guys in your sig homosexual partners by any chance?
lmao no they aint faggets, one's a radio host and the other is a rapper
......learn!
is that all you got? about my sigwithoutaface said:Are those guys in your sig homosexual partners by any chance?
Why, then, are they puckering up?bitchgirl said:is that all you got? about my sig
lmao no they aint faggets, one's a radio host and the other is a rapper
......learn!
i dont rely on media reports, i put this into my own thoughtsdanie said:not trying to be a hard ass says the user with the name "bitchgirl"... the irony.
why don't you offer something constructive rather than relying on baseless asumptions fuelled by biased media reports.
nope they just posin', and u've got plenty of me?withoutaface said:Why, then, are they puckering up?
EDIT: And I've got plenty on you, but I'd prefer to take my own angle on an argument, and everyone else is doing a fine job of putting shit on the contents of your posts.
As I said, everyone else has attacked your argument, and in your typical moronic way, you've justified your argument by saying "We're all entitled to our own opinions". Yes we are, but if you're going to post in here you should be able to back them up.bitchgirl said:nope they just posin', and u've got plenty of me?
and takin' me on by my sig instead?
You're right. We can have opinions on other countries' laws. But we should respect it. We have no idea why they have the harsh law, so we are in no position to demand them to change it.spell check said:as citizens of the world i think we are entitled to have opinions on whether or not laws are too extreme or draconian
for example i think having the death penalty or life imprisonment for importing marijuana is ridiculously harsh, just like i could look back in history and saw laws allowing rape within marriage were ridiculous
law isn't some holy thing that you mustn't question, they're just words put together by a bunch of people that have the backing of the state's monopoly on the use of violence
so everyone has attacked on me for sayin' she's innocentwithoutaface said:As I said, everyone else has attacked your argument, and in your typical moronic way, you've justified your argument by saying "We're all entitled to our own opinions". Yes we are, but if you're going to post in here you should be able to back them up.
Anti-opinion? No.bitchgirl said:so everyone has attacked on me for sayin' she's innocent
what is this? the anti-opinion thread?
my typical moronic way? uhh ok lmao
I agree, this case only highlights our need for a nuclear arsenal.Iron woman said:Well if that's no reason for a pre-emptive strike, then what is?
why should we respect them?Wesnat said:You're right. We can have opinions on other countries' laws. But we should respect it. We have no idea why they have the harsh law, so we are in no position to demand them to change it.
I understand. But hopefully you can understand that i am put on the defensive when someone like bitchgirl makes a statement like "if she was guilty she should've received 5 years in jail instead of 20".spell check said:as citizens of the world i think we are entitled to have opinions on whether or not laws are too extreme or draconian
for example i think having the death penalty or life imprisonment for importing marijuana is ridiculously harsh, just like i could look back in history and saw laws allowing rape within marriage were ridiculous
law isn't some holy thing that you mustn't question, they're just words put together by a bunch of people that have the backing of the state's monopoly on the use of violence
I'm with spell check,spell check said:why should we respect them?
the entire world should strive for just laws
I'm with spell check,spell check said:why should we respect them?
the entire world should strive for just laws
The defence's reasons and attempts to defend Corby are weak in comparison.Loz#1 said:Whilst I'm not expert on Indonesian law, the judges reasons and attempts at justifying why he put her in prison angered me.
Blah, I had a whole reply written out and BOS fucked up. In short, I heard that the judge used God as an attempt to justify his ruling. I won't question or say bad about the man's faith, but as a judge I do believe he should have based his ruling on evidence and the facts, or as you say lack there of, rather than a higher power. That's what angered me most.Wesnat said:The defence's reasons and attempts to defend Corby are weak in comparison.