Originally posted by Patricio
quite a list (you forgot Mitsubishi's MIVEC though
![Stick Out Tongue :p :p]()
)! Of course VCT = S-VT (cos Mazda engines are usually in Fords and vice versa).
About the S2000 having the best power-to-litre ratio for an N/A - it makes 174kW for 2L. It's a shame it only makes around 200Nm of Torque (at 7000RPM lol). Stock N/A 1990 323s/lasers even make 155Nm @ 3500RPM from a 1.8L, so the power of the S2K is good, it's just the torque sucks (for a car that is portrayed as a sports car).
Knew I forgot something ... MIVEC. Is the Mazda/Ford relationship still going strong? Keep thinking it's in the same boat as the Holden/Toyota relationship which ended a while back (from which we got cars like the Holden Nova, Apollo). At the end of the day, all the variable valve timing technologies are pretty much the same in theory and application, while methods might differ slighty.
Agreed, torque from the S2000 is pretty poor for a sports car. I think the S2200 (concept atm, I think) with a 2.2ltr engine should bump up the torque a bit with an extra 200cc, however shouldn't be anything dramatic unless the engineers at honda do something else ... supercharger perhaps, just like in 2F2F