It doesn't actually say the reason they covered.There was a reason why Adam and Eve discovered ways of covering the body...
It doesn't actually say the reason they covered.There was a reason why Adam and Eve discovered ways of covering the body...
Modesty, foolIt doesn't actually say the reason they covered.
I gathered that after they ate the apple from the tree of knowledge they discovered how other humans could be created without God. But God created Adam and Eve intially just so he could share the world he had created with the two of them. He wanted to test their respect for Him though, thus tempting them with the tree of knowledge. So anywho they learn about sex and are like "oh em gee, you shouldn't be looking here, these are MINE."It doesn't actually say the reason they covered.
Since when did aesthetic disagreement govern what people can and cannot do?I'd rather not go around the street seeing saggy, wrinkly dicks of old men.
Kid: Hey daddy, why is that thing sticking up?Since when did aesthetic disagreement govern what people can and cannot do?
Nudity everywhere but schools, certain workplaces, hospitals etc.
hey daddy where do babies come from?Kid: Hey daddy, why is that thing sticking up?
Dad: Well when a man loves a woman...
"go ask your mother"hey daddy where do babies come from?
But the extreme heightened sexualisation of any nudity is only a learned cultural thing, and when you change the legislation and make nudity more common and normalised, the absurd hyper-sexualisation of a man in his natural state will be reduced.With the sexualised culture of ours, acts such as sexual harassment will naturally occur more frequently.
I dont think things would really change that much, the vast majority of people would still wear clothes for modesty, warmth, protection or to make a fashion statement. The only real difference is people wont be prosecuted for being naked if they want to.A+ thread
But the extreme heightened sexualisation of any nudity is only a learned cultural thing, and when you change the legislation and make nudity more common and normalised, the absurd hyper-sexualisation of a man in his natural state will be reduced.
Our fear and hysteria of the natural human form is sickening to the soul, corruption and rot of the human spirit, the state attempting to suppress and control the experience of human emotion and desire.
Is it really necessary to write every post like your being marked on it for english. Like come on, surely there are better ways to big note yourself.It has everything to do with God. Innocence vanished, paradise lost, lost, lost - unrecoverable in this life. Given the practical issues, being nude in public would take a clear and determined effort on the part of the nudie to put up with various threats and what I believe to be an inherent shame as powerful as our internal instinct and certainty that we are a created being, not alone in this life.
The sort of hedonistic utopia you invisage, where men and women are free to feast their eyes on the forbidden flesh of a stranger, is not sustainable. It would only apply to those who seek nothing but an impersonal and immediate sexual transaction. It is a totally dehumanising and demeaning vision, where the soul is denied and only the body is looked to as the depository of meaning. It is the apocalyptic fulfillment of the cold, mechanical, material society, where human rights and dignity and needs for genuine love are laughed at and trampled on by a pack of rutting camels, eyes dumb and soft with remembered pleasure.
But we are a being created in the image of our maker. We have far sharper needs.
Way to mix up the adam and eve story.There was a reason why Adam and Eve discovered ways of covering the body...
This is a very weird post!I was just thinking, why should it be criminalised to be naked?
As long as you are not acting in a perverted and sexually harmful way to others, why does the state assume the right to command that you wear various fabrics?
In the netherlands, you can at least walk around topless as a woman and this is ignored completely, not even regarded as sexual...
Who would support full public nudity rather then just in "designated areas"?
whutWay to mix up the adam and eve story.
Kid: Hey daddy, why is that thing sticking up?
Dad: Well when a man loves a woman...
I support this thinking. All the "moralists" ignore the time value of law. Over time, as the number of people naked grew, this would generally become accepted and "sexualisation" would drop.A+ thread
But the extreme heightened sexualisation of any nudity is only a learned cultural thing, and when you change the legislation and make nudity more common and normalised, the absurd hyper-sexualisation of a man in his natural state will be reduced.
Our fear and hysteria of the natural human form is sickening to the soul, corruption and rot of the human spirit, the state attempting to suppress and control the experience of human emotion and desire.